Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 370 2016 SLD 370 2016 SCMR 733
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos. 616 and 617 of 2014, decided on 3rdFebruary, 2016.
MIAN SAQIB NISAR, SH. AZMAT SAEED AND QAZI FAEZ ISA, JJ
Makhdoom Ali Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Tariq Aziz, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant (in both cases).Tariq Mehmood, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents Nos.1-2 (in C.A. 616 of 2014

Sheikh MUHAMMAD AKRAMVsABDUL GHAFOOR and 19 others

Law: Representation of the People Act, 1976

Section: 12(1),14,69,76A(1)

Law: Representation of the People (Conduct of Elections) Rules, 1977

Section: 3

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 279,337-F

(a) Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976)--- ----Ss. 14 & 76A(1)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 279 & 337-F---Nomination papers---Returned candidate failing to disclose a pending case of rash driving in his nomination papers---Returned candidate could not be de-seated in terms of S. 76A of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 on account of such non-disclosure as the criminal case was not a very serious offence, being basically a traffic offence---Non-disclosure of a pending case could not be equated with the non-disclosure of a criminal case in which a person had been convicted and one which may entail his disqualification---Returned candidate, in the present case, was thus qualified to contest elections, and was not disqualified because of the pendency of the criminal case---Complainant of the case of rash driving had resiled from his complaint, consequently, the returned candidate was acquitted---At the stage of scrutiny of the returned candidate's Nomination Form no objection was taken regarding the non-disclosure of the said case, and if it had been taken, the returned candidate could have mentioned the same in paragraph 4 of the Nomination Form without any adverse consequences---Returned candidate was not provided with an opportunity to correct his Nomination Form---Pendency of the case in respect of a traffic offence may not be a sufficient reason to dissuade those who had voted for the returned candidate not to have done so---Election of returned candidate could not be declared to be void in such circumstances---Supreme Court declared returned candidate as the elected candidate from the constituency. Sadiq Ali Memon v. Returning Officer, NA-237 2013 SCMR 1246 and Abdul Ghafoor Lehri v. Returning Officer, PB-29 2013 SCMR 1271 distinguished. (b) Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976)--- ----Ss. 12(1) & 76A(1)---Representation of the People (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1977, R. 3---Nomination papers of returned candidate---Discrepancies/errors in particulars of the seconder---Incorrect Computerized National Identity Card Number (CNIC)---When discrepancies/errors in particulars of the seconder were not substantial in…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register