| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 2584 2018 SLD 2584 2018 PCRLJ 1264 |
Islamabad High Court
Cr. A. No. 25 of 2017, decision Dated: 25-06-2018, hearing Date : 11-06-2018
ATHAR MINALLAH, JUSTICE MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Syed Hamid Ali Shah and Syed Ishfaq Hussain Naqvi, Raja Khalid Mehmood, Deputy Attorney General and Gohal Ali Shah, SI/IO/FIA
Respondent(s) by: Dr. Babar Awan, Raja Rizwan Abbasi, Haroon-ur-Rashid, Sohail Akhtar, Sher Afzal Khan, Naila
Cr. A. No. 25 of 2017, decision Dated: 25-06-2018, hearing Date : 11-06-2018
ATHAR MINALLAH, JUSTICE MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Syed Hamid Ali Shah and Syed Ishfaq Hussain Naqvi, Raja Khalid Mehmood, Deputy Attorney General and Gohal Ali Shah, SI/IO/FIA
Respondent(s) by: Dr. Babar Awan, Raja Rizwan Abbasi, Haroon-ur-Rashid, Sohail Akhtar, Sher Afzal Khan, Naila
THE STATE THROUGH DG FIA ISLAMABAD
VS
SHOAIB AHMED SHEIKH AND 26 OTHERS
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 419,420,468,471
Law: Anti Money Laundering Act, 2010
Section: 4
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 417
Law: Electronic Transactions Ordinance, 2002
Section: 36,37
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 419, 420, 468, 471---Electronic Transactions Ordinance (LI of 2002), Ss. 36 & 37---Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010), S.4---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417---Cheating, forgery, violation of privacy of information, damage to information system and money laundering---Appeal against acquittal---Bias in the mind of judge---Illegal gratification---Proof---All accused facing trial were acquitted by Trial Court---Plea raised by prosecution was that Presiding Judge of Trial Court was removed from service for having received illegal gratification from accused persons---Effect---Slightest pecuniary interest of a judge disqualified the latter and depending on facts and circumstances of each case, any kind of bias vitiated proceedings or decision as the case might be---Presiding Judge was proceeded against and major penalty of removal from service was imposed upon him on the allegation of accepting illegal gratification from accused persons---Judgment passed by Trial Court was vitiated on the ground of pecuniary interest of Presiding Judge against whom charge of accepting illegal gratification stood established---High Court set aside the passed in favour of accused persons and remanded the case to Trial Court for decision afresh after affording opportunity of hearing to all parties---Appeal was allowed in circumstances. Khairdi Khan and others v. The Crown PLD 1953 FC 223; Haji Muhammad Jalal v. Ijaz Ahmad Bajwa, Assistant Director, FIA, State Bank Circle, Lahore, and others 2000 MLD 837; Asif Ali Zardari and another v. The State PLD 2001 SC 568; Aftab Shahban Mirani v. President of Pakistan and others 1998 SCMR 1863; Ms. Benazir Bhutto v. The President of Pakistan and another 1992 SCMR 140; Messrs MFMY Industries Ltd. and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Ministry of Commerce and others 2015 SCMR 1550; Anwar and another v. The Crown PLD 1955 FC 185; Federation of Pakistan v. Muhammad Akram Shaikh PLD 1989 SC 689; Government of N.-W.F.P. through Chief Secretary and another v. Dr. Hussain Ahmad Haroon and others 2003 SCMR 104 and Muhammad Adnan alias Dana v. State 2015 SCMR 1570 ref. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492