Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 791 2016 SLD 791 2016 PLC 392
High Court (AJ&K)
Writ Petitions Nos. 2273, 2285 and 2320 of 2014, decided on 4th February, 2015.
M. TABASSUM AFTAB ALVI AND SARDAR ABDUL HAMEED KHAN, JJ
Raja Muhammad Hanif Khan, Raja Sajjad Ahmed Khan and Bashir Ahmed Mughal for Petitioners. Ch. Shoukat Aziz, Addl. A.G. for official
Respondents. Nemo for
Respondent No. 4 (in Writ Petition No. 2320 of 2014). Ch. Muhammad Mushtaq for
Respondent No. 5 (i

MUHAMMAD AZEEM MUJADADI and others

VS

AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR SHARIAT COURT (COMPETENT AUTHORITY) through Registrar and others

Law:

Section:

(a) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)- ----S. 44---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXIII, R. 1 & O. II, R.2---Writ petition---Filing of second writ petition when previous such petition was pending on the same subject---Procedure---Civil service---Advertisement for the post of Tehsil Qazi---Ad hoc service, termination of--- Scope--- Acquiescence, principle of--- Applicability---Ad-hoc appointment could be terminated before completion of the period in case of returned candidates of Public Service Commission---Competent authority could terminate ad-hoc service without serving any notice at any time---Petitioners having accepted conditions of ad-hoc appointment, could not turn around from the conditions due to principle of acquiescence---Ad-hoc appointment did not create any right for regular service and appointee could be terminated at any time---First writ petition of the petitioners on the same facts and similar grounds was pending for adjudication---Petitioners should include the whole claim in their writ petition---Petitioners could withdraw first writ petition in case of formal defect or due to other sufficient grounds in the first writ petition subject to filing of fresh one---Petitioners, after appearing before the Public Service Commission, were placed at waiting merit list---All the grounds raised by the petitioners in subsequent writ petition were available to them at the time of filing of previous writ petition---Petitioners having relinquished various grounds in the earlier writ petition, subsequent writ petitions were barred---Withdrawal of earlier writ petition at belated stage could not cure the defect of subsequent writ petition which was filed without permission of Court---Petitioners were not entitled to discretionary relief who had suppressed facts and had not invoked writ jurisdiction with clean hands---High Court refused to allow withdrawal of previous writ petition at belated stage---Petitioners had committed misrepresentation and falsehood and they were not entitled for equitable relief of writ jurisdiction---Writ petitions were dismissed, in circumstances. Azad Government v. Haji Mir Muhammad Naseer and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492