| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 1337 2015 SLD 1337 2015 SCMR 92 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 568 of 2008, decision dated: 26-08-2014
ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Gulzarin Kiyani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant Haji Muhammad Zahir Shah, Advocate Supreme Court/Advocate-on-Record
Civil Appeal No. 568 of 2008, decision dated: 26-08-2014
ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Gulzarin Kiyani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant Haji Muhammad Zahir Shah, Advocate Supreme Court/Advocate-on-Record
Mst. ROOH AFZA
VS
AURANGZEB and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-emption Act (X of 1987)--- ----Ss. 13 & 14---Suit for possession through pre-emption---Pre-emptor not appearing as witness before the Trial Court without any valid justification---Effect---Pre-emptor exercised her right of pre-emption by making the requisite Talbs, and the suit for possession through pre-emption was also instituted by her in person---Subsequently without any valid justification, the pre-emptor did not appear before the Trial Court as witness for exercising her right of pre-emption, but for such purpose, she gave special power-of-attorney to her husband---Suit for possession through pre-emption had been rightly dismissed by the High Court in such circumstances---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. Abdul Qayyum v. Muhammad Sadiq 2007 SCMR 957 ref. (b) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-emption Act (X of 1987)--- ----S. 13---Suit for possession through pre-emption---Performance of Talb-i-Muwathibat---Lapse of 10-15 minutes in performing Talb-i-Muwathibat---Effect---Fatal to right of pre-emption--- Slightest lapse of time in performance of Talb-i-Muwathibat was fatal to the case of the pre-emptor---No redundancy could be attributed in performance of Talb-i-Muwathibat to accommodate a pre-emptor who had not been vigilant in making such Talb---Pre-emptor consumed 10-15 minutes to discuss the matter with her family members before taking the decision of exercising her right of pre-emption---Talb-i-Muwathibat was not performed in accordance with law in such circumstances---Suit for possession through pre-emption had been rightly dismissed by the High Court---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. Mian Pir Muhammad v. Faqir Muhammad PLD 2007 SC 302; Muhammad Nazeef Khan v. Gulbat Khan 2012 SCMR 235; Sonabashi Kuer v. Chaudhary Ramdeo Singh AIR 1951 Pat 521 and Muhammad Ahmad Said Khan v. Madho Prasad 35 Ind Cas 911 ref. (c) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-emption Act (X of 1987)--- ----S. 13--- Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 79--- Suit for possession through pre-emption---Talb-i-Ishhad---Attestation by two witnesses---Non-appearance of one of the witnesses of Talb-i-Ishhad in court---Effect---Fatal to right of pre-emption---Plea of pre-emptor…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492