Case Details

Citation(s)
2017 SLG 1200 2017 SLD 1200 2017 PLJ 432
Lahore High Court
Crl. A. No. 287 of 2013, Crl. Rev. No. 266 of 2013 and M.R. No. 63 of 2013, decided on 28.10.2016. Date of hearing: 28.10.2016.
SADAQAT ALI KHAN AND SHEHRAM SARWAR CH., JJ.
Mian Muhammad Sikandar Hayat, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Waqas Anwar, Deputy Prosecutor General for State. Rai Zameer-ul-Hassan, Advocate for Complainant.

ZAFAR ALI and others . --Appellants

VS

STATE and others . --Respondents

Law:

Section:

Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) --.-- --.-- S. 302(b) --.-- Conviction and sentence --.-- Challenge to --.-- Modification in quantum of sentence --.-- Eye-witnesses in their testimonies before trial Court have not only identified appellants but also implicated them with specific role --.-- If testing of a witness qua identity of accused even in Court inspires confidence, witness is consistent on all material particulars and there is nothing in evidence to suggest that he/she is deposing falsely, in such circumstances, his/her testimony cannot be discarded --.-- Eye-witnesses were subjected to lengthy cross-examination but they remained consistent on material aspects of case and nothing favourable to defence could be extracted --.-- Motive in present case was to effect that all three appellants along with their co-accused entered house of complainant and during commission of dacoity --.-- Father of complainant was done to death and mother of complainant sustained fire-arm injuries --.-- It is not a case of capital punishment to extent of appellant because of reason that recovery of 44 bore rifle at instance of said appellant has not been proved --.-- Prosecution's failure to prove recovery of rifle at instance of appellant would constitute a mitigating circumstance for reducing sentence of death to imprisonment for life --.-- There is a extenuating circumstance, on basis of which appellant could not be made liable to maximum punishment provided u/S. 302(b) read with Section 396 PPC, rather ends of justice would be met, if his death sentence is converted into imprisonment for life --.-- While maintaining conviction u/Ss. 302(b) read with S. 396 PPC, Court alter sentence of appellant from death to imprisonment for life --.-- However, all sentences of three appellants shall run concurrently --.-- Appeal stands dismissed with above modification in quantum of sentence to extent of appellant. 2008 SCMR 1644; 2009 SCMR 1188 & 2007 SCMR 1413 ref. Evidentiary value --.-- It is by now well established proposition of law that if crime empty is sent to Forensic Science Laboratory after arrest of accused or together with crime weapon, positive report of said…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492