| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 396 2016 SLD 396 2016 PLD 97 |
Lahore High Court
R.F.As. Nos. 916, 320 and 1003 of 2011, decided on 10th April, 2012.
SH. AZMAT SAEED, C.J., MUHAMMAD AMEER BHATTI AND MUHAMMAD KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN, JJ
Ali Azfar Tirmizi for Appellant.
R.F.As. Nos. 916, 320 and 1003 of 2011, decided on 10th April, 2012.
SH. AZMAT SAEED, C.J., MUHAMMAD AMEER BHATTI AND MUHAMMAD KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN, JJ
Ali Azfar Tirmizi for Appellant.
MUMTAZ HUSSAIN
VS
Haji MUHAMMAD BASHIR and others
Law: West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962)
Section: 17,18
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 96
(a) West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962)----Ss. 17 & 18---Suits Valuation Act (VII of 1887), Preamble---Appeal, filing of---Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court---Suit value fixed in the plaint---Pecuniary jurisdiction of a suit for the purpose of an appeal was that which the plaintiff himself/itself fixed in the plaint and not the value ascertained by the Court. (b) West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962)-- ----S. 18---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.96---Decree passed by Civil Judge---First Appeal, filing of---Forum---District Judge or High Court---Pecuniary value of decree---Where the Civil Judge passed a decree of pecuniary value in excess of Rs.2.5 million first appeal there-against would lie before the High Court---All decrees of Civil Judge not exceeding the pecuniary value of Rs.2.5 million would be heard by a District Judge. (c) West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962)-- ----S. 17--- Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.96---High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol. V, Chap. 3, Part B, Rr.1 & 2---Decree passed by District Judge---First appeal, filing of---Forum---Single Bench or Division Bench of High Court---Pecuniary value of decree---All decrees passed by District Judge having pecuniary value of less than Rs.2.5 million would be heard by a Single Bench of High Court, whereas decrees having pecuniary value exceeding Rs.2.5 million would be heard by Division Bench of High Court. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN, J.--Through this single judgment, we propose to decide RFA No.916/11, RFA No.320/11 and RFA No.1003/11. The question requiring resolution is, whether a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against a decree passed by District Judge in its original jurisdiction, will be heard by a Single Bench or Division Bench of High Court. 2. A learned Division Bench of this Court decided the issue in RFA No.320 of 2011 titled "Javaid alias Maula v. Mst. Shaheen Akhtar" and held that first appeal against a decree passed by a learned District Judge in his original jurisdiction not exceeding Rs.2.5 million will be heard by Single Bench of High Court and decree having pecuniary,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492