| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 2845 2016 SLD 2845 2016 MLD 780 |
Sindh High Court
C.P. No. S-409 of 2011, decided on 2nd February, 2015.
SHAHNAWAZ TARIQ, JUSTICE
Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui for Petitioners. Khawaja Naveed Ahmed for
Respondent No. 3.
C.P. No. S-409 of 2011, decided on 2nd February, 2015.
SHAHNAWAZ TARIQ, JUSTICE
Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui for Petitioners. Khawaja Naveed Ahmed for
Respondent No. 3.
Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. through Chief Manager - er
VS
The VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE and 2 OTHERS --Respondent
Law: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)
Section: 8,9,9(2)
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979) --------- ----------Ss. 8 & 9 --------- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 --------- Constitutional petition --------- Fair rent, determination and fixation of --------- Enhancement of rent --------- Condition --------- Interpretation of Ss. 8 & 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 --------- Sections 8 & 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 were self-determining provisions having their independent domain --------- Section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 had provided parameters for the enhancement of rent by the Rent Controller to fix fair rent of a tenement --------- Rent Controller should fix fair rent with care and caution --------- No restriction or limit existed to minimize the authority of Rent Controller to fix the rent of a demised premises --------- Section 9(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 had no nexus with S. 8 of the Ordinance --------- Rent Controller and Appellate Court had ample powers to assess all the relevant circumstances while fixing fair rent --------- Landlord had never approached the Rent Controller for enhancement of rent nor any fair rent was fixed after inception of tenancy between the parties --------- Present quantum of rent was less and not in accordance with the prevailing rent of the locality --------- Demised premises was situated in thickly populated area which was famous for business and commercial activities --------- Inflation in cost of construction and hike in cost of land had also caused increase in rental value of the premises of the locality --------- Appellate Court had properly considered the evidence of the parties and modified the passed by the Rent Controller --------- Tenant had failed to point out any illegality or irregularity in the passed by the Appellate Court --------- Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. 2001 SCMR 1161 and PLD 2007 Kar. 485 ref. (b) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979) --------- ----------S. 9 --------- Enhancement of rent --------- Condition --------- If fair rent of the demised premises had already been fixed, rent should not be enhanced for the next three years…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492