Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 1351 2015 SLD 1351 2015 SCMR 258
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No.411 of 2007, decision dated: 18-11-2014
IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY, DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN AND QAZI FAEZ ISA, JJ
Muhammad Aziz Sindhu, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Ahmed Raza Qasuri, Additional P.G. for the State

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

VS

The STATE

Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b) & 324---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd---Re-appraisal of evidence---Pre-planned murder---Strained relations between accused and complainant party---Plea of alibi not proved---Accused was alleged to have killed the deceased and also caused injuries to witnesses---Accused was sentenced to death, which sentence was maintained by the High Court---Validity---Accused was closely related to the complainant party and both parties were known to each other, thus there was no question of mistaken identity or false implication---Injuries on the person of witnesses were serious---Injured witnesses specifically stated that accused had fired upon them---Although statements of injured witnesses were recorded after a delay of 10 days but after the incident they were in an uncertain and unsafe condition and were not able to make statements---Doctor treating the injured witnesses had also refused permission to police to immediately record their statements---High Court had correctly found that accused had strained relations with the complainant party, which was the motive for the occurrence---Plea of alibi raised by accused to the effect that he was in another city at the time of occurrence was not backed by evidence on record---Accused also led to the recovery of weapon of offence---Accused was solely responsible for the occurrence and had committed a pre-planned murder---Prosecution had succeeded in proving its case beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal filed by accused was dismissed accordingly. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 324---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd---Injured witness, statement of---Discrepancy between medical evidence and ocular account given by witness regarding nature of weapon used by accused---Effect---Injured witnesses were not expected to mention exact kind and make of weapon in a situation of sensation and panic---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Quantum of punishment---Death sentence, award of---Convict spending 17 years in death cell---Plea of convict that he was in death cell for 17 years, which period of custody exceeded a full…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492