Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 434 2015 SLD 434 2015 PCRLJ 58
Lahore High Court
Criminal Revision No. 43 of 2014, heard on 2nd April, 2014
MUHAMMAD TARIQ ABBASI, J
Usman Sharif Khosa for Petitioner. Mian Abdul Qayyum, Additional Prosecutor-General for the State. Malik Muhammad Saleem for
Respondent

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

VS

The STATE and another

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 205,540-A

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 540-A---Exemption to an accused from personal appearance---Conditions to be fulfilled for grant of exemption to an accused enumerated. Following are the conditions that should be fulfilled to claim and grant exemption to an accused from personal appearance during trial:-- (i) There should be two or more accused before the court; (ii) The accused seeking exemption should be before the court; (iii) The accused should be incapable of remaining before the court; (iv) The accused should be represented by a pleader; (v) The Court should be satisfied about the incapability of the accused to remain before it. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 205 & 540-A---Exemption to an accused from personal appearance---Grounds and conditions---Accused earning his livelihood abroad---Accused faced trial along with the co-accused and sought dispensation from personal appearance on the grounds that he was working and earning his livelihood abroad, for which purpose he had obtained a visa after incurring heavy expenditure; that during investigation he had been declared innocent, but appeared and joined the trial on summoning of the court, and that in his place an advocate would appear in the court on each and every date of hearing and join the proceedings---Validity---Incapability to appear before the Trial Court, as pleaded by the accused could be termed a fit (ground) for exemption--- Accused fulfilled all the conditions that were required to be fulfilled to claim and grant exemption to an accused from personal appearance during trial---After grant of dispensation by the Trial Court, no hurdle had occurred in the trial due to non-availability of accused--- Revision petition against dispensation allowed to accused was dismissed in circumstances with the direction that if at any stage of trial, Trial Court felt any hurdle due to non-availability of accused or his advocate, then it should not hesitate in withdrawing the concession and requiring personal appearance of accused. Haji Aurangzeb v. Mushtaq Ahmad and another PLD 2004 SC 160 rel. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD TARIQ ABBASI, J.---This revision petition is directed…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492