| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 3124 2016 SLD 3124 2016 MLD 897 |
Sindh High Court
High Court Appeal No. 15 of 1979, decided on 22nd December, 2015. Dates of hearing: 5th, 19th December, 2014 and 23rd November, 2015.
NADEEM AKHTAR AND MUHAMMAD IQBAL KALHORO, JUSTICE
Syed Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi for Appellant. A. H. Mirza for
Respondent.
High Court Appeal No. 15 of 1979, decided on 22nd December, 2015. Dates of hearing: 5th, 19th December, 2014 and 23rd November, 2015.
NADEEM AKHTAR AND MUHAMMAD IQBAL KALHORO, JUSTICE
Syed Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi for Appellant. A. H. Mirza for
Respondent.
Messrs TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD. - --Appellant
VS
Messrs GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINES - --Respondent
Law:
Section:
Arbitration Act (X of 1940) --------- ----------Ss.3, 16, 26-A & 30 [as inserted by Arbitration (Amendment) Ordinance (XV of 1981)] --------- Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S. 3 --------- Arbitration --------- Intra-court appeal --------- Objection to award --------- Remission of case --------- Reasons not stated --------- Parties referred their dispute to arbitrator who unanimously appointed umpire and a unanimous award was given --------- Arbitrators filed the award in court and despite objections filed by appellant, single Judge of High Court made it rule of the Court --------- Appellant sought dismissal of award on the plea that arbitrators did not give reasons of award and after their death parties were not willing to appoint new arbitrator --------- Validity --------- Case fell under S. 16 (1)(c) of Arbitration Act, 1940, as objection raised by appellant to legality of award that it lacked reasons was apparent on the face of it --------- Such objection was also accepted by High Court when the matter was remitted to surviving arbitrator for reasons in sufficient details which order was upheld by Supreme Court --------- Surviving arbitrator failed to reconsider the award and to submit his decision and reasons in sufficient details within the stipulated period --------- Such award had become void under S. 16(3) of Arbitration Act, 1940 --------- Arbitration agreement between parties ceased to have effect with respect to dispute referred thereunder and such reference was liable to be superseded under S. 19 of Arbitration Act, 1940 --------- Parties were unwilling to appoint new arbitrators and the award could not be remitted to any other arbitrator --------- Award had become void and arbitration agreement between parties could not be given effect to and the same had become frustrated --------- Reference was superseded under S. 19 of Arbitration Act, 1940 and the arbitration agreement ceased to have effect with respect to differences/dispute referred in pursuance thereof to arbitrators and umpire --------- Division Bench of High Court set aside and decree passed by single Judge of High Court resultantly award was set aside --------- Appeal was…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492