| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 747 2016 SLD 747 2016 PLC 560 |
Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal, Punjab
S.A. No. 9 of 2006, heard on 24th April, 2015. Date of hearing: 24th April, 2015.
MEHMOOD MAQBOOL BAJWA AND SHAHID WAHEED, JJ
Talat Farooq Sheikh and Maqbool Hussain Sheikh for Appellant. Zubda Tul Hussain for
Respondents.
S.A. No. 9 of 2006, heard on 24th April, 2015. Date of hearing: 24th April, 2015.
MEHMOOD MAQBOOL BAJWA AND SHAHID WAHEED, JJ
Talat Farooq Sheikh and Maqbool Hussain Sheikh for Appellant. Zubda Tul Hussain for
Respondents.
MUHAMMAD AKBAR SAJID CHAUDHARY
VS
LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE through Registrar and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991)--- ----S. 5---Judicial officer---Unauthorized shifting of telephone---Misconduct---Quantum of punishment---Show-cause notice, issuance of---Dispensing with regular inquiry---Minor penalty of stoppage of three annual increments was imposed on the appellant---Mala fide---Proportionality of sentence, doctrine of---Show-cause notice was issued to the appellant by dispensing with regular inquiry and he was imposed minor penalty of stoppage of three annual increments for unauthorized shifting of telephone---Validity---Departmental authorities had choice in law to determine quantum of punishment in the light of nature of misconduct---Penalty should be commensurate with the magnitude of misconduct committed by the civil servant---Unauthorized shifting of telephone from one place to another was not a penal offence---Penalty in such like case was only disconnection of unauthorized shifted telephone---Shifting of telephone was a trivial infraction of rules---Purpose of deterrent punishment was not only to maintain balance with the gravity of wrong done but also to make an example for others as a preventive measure for reformation of society---Concept of minor punishment was to make an attempt to reform the individual wrong-doer---No allegation was on record with regard to mala fide, ill-will or ulterior motive for shifting of telephone---Nothing was on record that appellant had taken benefit from a private person by shifting of telephone---Unauthorized shifting of telephone might be construed as negligence and that too of a small nature which did not breach the discipline of service---Said negligence although did deserve minor punishment but not stoppage of three increments---Mercy in the Islamic Jurisprudence was a rule where the wrong was trivial---Doctrine of proportionality of sentence had been recognized in law even in modern jurisprudence---Punishment of stoppage of three increments did not commensurate with the gravity of charge in the present case which was converted into censure---Appeal was partly allowed in circumstances. (b) Civil service--- ----Misconduct---Departmental authorities had choice…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492