| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 3130 2016 SLD 3130 2016 MLD 931 |
Sindh High Court
Suit No. 1405 of 1998, decided on 23rd November, 2015.
NAZAR AKBAR, JUSTICE
Talha Kamal, for Defendant No. 7. Muhammad Vawda, for Defendants Nos.9 and 10. Iftikharul Hasan, for CDGK. Danial Bux, holding brief for Rehman Aziz Malik for the Interveners.
Suit No. 1405 of 1998, decided on 23rd November, 2015.
NAZAR AKBAR, JUSTICE
Talha Kamal, for Defendant No. 7. Muhammad Vawda, for Defendants Nos.9 and 10. Iftikharul Hasan, for CDGK. Danial Bux, holding brief for Rehman Aziz Malik for the Interveners.
RAFAT MALIK JAMAL - --Plaintiff
VS
MUNAWAR MALIK JAMAL and 12 OTHERS ----Defendants Shaukat Jamal, --Defendant No. 4 in person.
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) --------- ----------Ss. 114, 151, O. XLVII, R. 1 & O. XXVI --------- -Review --------- Scope --------- Provisions of review of order under S. 114 or O. XLVII, R. 1, C.P.C. and provisions of S. 151, C.P.C., for correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes in the order, could be invoked simultaneously --------- Appointment of Commission by Court to examine witnesses --------- High Court accepted application of interveners; whereas, Division Bench of High Court modified the said order of acceptance, remanded the case to decide issue as to legal status of the interveners within six months, for which Commission had been appointed --------- APPLICANT filed application for review of said order of appointment of Commission --------- Validity --------- APPLICANT was not sure as to whether the order sought to be reviewed contained typographical errors, or the same was result of overlooking certain facts on record, nor had he showed as to what prejudice had been caused to him, for which review was necessitated --------- Failure of applicant to record evidence on pretext of pendency of review application was calculated move to delay decision on merit --------- Application was dismissed with cost in circumstances. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) --------- ----------O. XIV, R. 5 --------- -Settlement of issues --------- Power to amend, and strike out, issues --------- Scope and object --------- Issues can be resettled even after recording of evidence and just before final order, either suo moto by court in terms of O. XIV, R. 5, C.P.C. or on request of parties --------- Purpose of said provision is to ensure that recording of evidence of parties should not be postponed. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: NAZAR AKBAR JUSTICE:------------- This order will govern the disposal of an application (CMA No. 3761/2015) for review of order dated 13.02.2015 passed on CMA No. 2003 of 2015. 2. In fact this suit is pending since 1998. This is a disposed of suit for administration of the estate of the deceased. The entire properties have already been ordered to be sold through Court. At present the controversy is between the Plaintiff and the intervenors…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492