| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 2285 2015 SLD 2285 2015 CLC 772 |
Sindh High Court
Suit No. 525 of 2011, C.M.As. Nos. 12763 of 2013 and 6229 of 2014, decided on 13th November, 2014. dates of hearing: 7th and 13th November, 2014.
SYED SAEEDUDDIN NASIR, J
Khalid Mehmood Siddiqui for Plaintiff. Ovais Ali Shah for Defendants Nos.1 to 4. Ms. Parveen Javed for Defendant No. 2. Sattar Awan for Defendant No. 5. Ms. Navin S. Merchant for Intervenors. Abdul Rahman, Advocate
Suit No. 525 of 2011, C.M.As. Nos. 12763 of 2013 and 6229 of 2014, decided on 13th November, 2014. dates of hearing: 7th and 13th November, 2014.
SYED SAEEDUDDIN NASIR, J
Khalid Mehmood Siddiqui for Plaintiff. Ovais Ali Shah for Defendants Nos.1 to 4. Ms. Parveen Javed for Defendant No. 2. Sattar Awan for Defendant No. 5. Ms. Navin S. Merchant for Intervenors. Abdul Rahman, Advocate
DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY--Plaintiff
VS
CREEK MARINA (PVT.) LIMITED (PAKISTAN) and 4 others----Defendants
Law:
Section:
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. I, R. 10 & O. XX, R. 16---Suit for rendition of account---Application for impleadment as a party---Scope---Huge investment of applicants were involved in the present case and they should be impleaded as a party to the suit---Interest of applicants would be protected and safeguarded if they were impleaded as a party to the present suit and same would not adversely affect the interest of any other party to the suit---Application for impleadment as a party was accepted and plaintiff was directed to file amended title and amended plaint within a specified period. ORDER SYED SAEEDUDDIN NASIR, J.--- This is an application C.M.A. No.6229 of 2014 under Order I, Rule 10(1) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, through which the applicants/interveners seek to be impleaded as a necessary party to this suit. Ms. Navin S. Merchant Advocate, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants/interveners inter alia contended that the applicants/ interveners paid installments to defendants Nos.1 to 4 in time whenever demands were made by them, but were extremely disappointed to see the slow progress at the site despite the fact that the applicants/interveners including other buyers of the project had reposed full faith in defendants No.1, 2 and 4 by paying approximately four billion rupees to the defendant No.1 for their apartments. Needless to mention that the amounts paid by applicants and other buyers are highly disproportionate to the actual cost and constructions which has taken place at site and today the defendants No.1 to 4 have almost abandoned the project. The plaintiff has filed above suit against the defendants for rendition of accounts, declaration, injunction, recovery and compensation in this Hon'ble Court and has prayed for judgment and decree against defendants No.1 to 4 requiring the defendants No.1 to 4 render complete accounts of the amounts received, expenditure incurred, amounts transferred out of Pakistan and amounts payable to individual and companies in Pakistan. The plaintiff has also prayed that defendants No.1 to 4 and their employees be restrained from operating their bank accounts maintained with defendant…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492