| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1974 SLG 261 1974 SLD 261 1974 PLD 11 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 24-P of 1970, decision dated: 2nd May 1973. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the former High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Bench, Peshawar, passed on the 10th of October 1968, in Second Appeal. No. 202 of 1967)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., SALAHUDDIN AHMED, ANWARUL HAQ AND MUHAMMAD GUL, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeal No. 24-P of 1970, decision dated: 2nd May 1973. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the former High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Bench, Peshawar, passed on the 10th of October 1968, in Second Appeal. No. 202 of 1967)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., SALAHUDDIN AHMED, ANWARUL HAQ AND MUHAMMAD GUL, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
SIKANDAR
VS
SULTAN MOHAMMAD
Law:
Section:
(a) N: W.F.P. Pre-emption Act (XIV of 1950)--- S. 12-Pre-emption-Muhammadan Law-Pre-emptor not full owner of contiguous house but merely having Haquq-e-Bashindgane Dawami (right of permanent residence) therein - Has no superior right of pre-emption under S. 12-Milk or ownership of Shufee (pre-emptor) in house sought to be pre-empted necessary-Condition not confined to house property onlyHaquq-e-Bashindgane Dawami not a full proprietary interest. Where the question was whether a mere right of permanent residence (Haquq-e-Bashindgane Dawami) was sufficient to give the person, having such a right, a right of pre-emption in regard to sale of contiguous property. Held: Where pre-emption is claimed the pre-emptor must have the milkiat or ownership in the property on account of which he claims the right of pre-emption. In Baillie's Digest of Mohammadan Law (2nd Edn., Book VII, p. 475) there are six conditions laid down for the enforcement of this right of preemption and the sixth condition is : "There must be milk or ownership of the shufee, or pre-emptor, at the time of the purchase, in the mansion on account of which he claims the right of pre-emption". The title-deed pertaining to the property of the pre-emptor clearly described the right conveyed as Haquq-e-Bashindgane Dawamf, which was certainly not a full proprietary interest. It appears that the appellant also, in his statement before the trial Court, merely described his property as his Maqbuza Makan and not as Makan-e-Mamluka. The High Court rightly held that the appellant did not possess a sufficiently superior right of pre-emption on this ground to claim the right of pre-emption of the adjoining property. [p. 16JD Syed Saeed-ud-Din v. Haji Iunus Mia P L D 1960 Dacca 416; Mohammad Jamil and others v. Khub Lal A I R 1921 Pat. 164; Dhirakhshan Singh v. Triloki Prashad Singh and others A I R 1923 Pat. 217: Phul Mohammad Khan and another v. Qazi Kutabuddin A I R 1937 Pat. 578; Sakina Bibi v. Amiran and others I L R 10 All. 472; Muhammadan Jurisprudence by Abdur Rahim; Hedaya and Majallah Chap. III, S. II, para. 1018; Baillie's Digest of Mohammadan Law, 2nd Edn., Vol. VII, p. 475; Dhashratlal Chhaganlal v.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492