Law:

Section:

Ex-parte Judgment --.-- --.-- Limitation --.-- Knowledge of --.-- No limitation runs against void order --.-- Conduct of petitioners-Department is also very indolent and negligent --.-- In trial Court, when an ex-parte and decree was passed against them being aggrieved, they had filed an appeal --.-- Against said ex-parte , which is also a time-barred appeal; therefore, appellate Court has no option, except to dismiss time-barred appeal. ORDER At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners stated that, admittedly this civil revision was filed beyond the period of limitation, but he stressed that the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below are illegal, unlawful; hence no limitation runs against void order. I am afraid with the contention of the petitioners, because a procedure of filing of civil revision envisaged under Section 115, CPC for which statutory period of 90-days, by Act VI of 1992, CPC (Amendment) Act, 1992, w.e.f. 24.05.1992 has been provided, and when the petitioners admitted that they were well within the knowledge of judgment and decree dated 20.09.2016, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Lahore, due to which they applied for obtaining certified copies, and the same were also delivered to them on 07.10.2016. But even then they have filed this civil revision with such an inordinate delay for which no justification, reason has been given by the petitioners, except that no limitation runs against void…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492