| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2017 SLG 1651 2017 SLD 1651 2017 SCMR 1179 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 165 of 2017, decision & hearing Date : 30-01-2017 (Against the judgment Dated 19.1.2017 of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi passed in C.P. No. D-3078 of 2016)
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, MAQBOOL BAQAR, JUSTICE
Sajid Ilyas Bhatti, DAG and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents.
Civil Petition No. 165 of 2017, decision & hearing Date : 30-01-2017 (Against the judgment Dated 19.1.2017 of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi passed in C.P. No. D-3078 of 2016)
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, MAQBOOL BAQAR, JUSTICE
Sajid Ilyas Bhatti, DAG and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH SECRETARY INTERIOR, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
VS
MS. AYYAN ALI AND OTHERS
Law: Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981
Section: 2
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)---.--- ---.----S. 2---.---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---.---Territorial jurisdiction of the Sindh High Court---.---Scope---.---Name of respondent had been placed on Exit Control list as she was nominated in a case of murder of a customs officer in connection with smuggling of foreign currency---.---Sindh High Court struck down the notification, issued by the Ministry of Interior, whereby name of respondent was placed on the Exit Control List, and inter alia gave directions to remove her name from the said List---.---Plea on behalf of Ministry of Interior that since the subject notification/memorandum, whereby her name was placed on the Exit Control List, was issued on basis of an order passed by the Lahore High Court, and as per the recommendations of the Home Department, Government of Punjab, the High Court of Sindh had no jurisdiction in the matter, and was thus not competent to entertain and decide the respondent's petition in such regard---.---Validity---.---Impugned notification/ memorandum had been issued by the Federal Government, which functioned all over the country---.---Federal Government, though may have exclusive residence or location at Islamabad, but it would be deemed to function all over the country---.---Since the respondent resided in Karachi, she had a right and choice to proceed abroad through the international airport in Karachi, and in fact at least twice earlier she had tried to go abroad through the said airport, but was stopped owing to the earlier notifications, whereby her name was placed on the Exit Control List---.---Embargo placed on the respondent from leaving the country had in fact taken place at Karachi, which prevention in all likelihood, was to be repeated at Karachi in pursuance of the present impugned notification/memorandum and thus gave rise to a cause of action against the said notification/memorandum at Karachi because of its taking effect there---.---Sindh High Court, thus, had the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the Constitutional petition filed by the respondent against the impugned notification/ memorandum. LPG Association of Pakistan through…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492