Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 2922 2016 SLD 2922 2016 YLR 2706
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
Civil Appeal No.51 of 2012, decision dated: 24-11-2015, hearing DATE : 29-01-2015.
MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN, CHIEF, JUSTICE, CH. MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM ZIA AND RAJA SAEED AKRAM KHAN, JUSTICE

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION MANGLA DAM RAISING PROJECT, MIRPUR

VS

QAMAR ABBAS RIZVI AND 4 others

Law:

Section:

Mansoor Pervaiz Khan for Appellant. Raja Hassan Akhtar for Respondent No.1. Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894)---.--- ---.---S. 18---.---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Grant of Khalsa Land (Ground Rent and Lease) Rules, 1985, R. 7---.---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules, 1978, O. XLIII, Rr. 5 & 6---.---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), S. 42-A---.---Lease of land---.---Cancellation---.---Land acquisition---.---Reference to court---.---Order without summoning of necessary party---.---Effect---.---Inherent powers of Supreme Court, exercise of---.---Scope---.---Lease of suit land was sanctioned in favour of applicant-lease-holder which was later on acquired for public purpose---.---Applicant-lease-holder moved application for referring the matter to the Referee Judge whereby he requested for payment and enhancement of compensation which was partly accepted---.---Validity---.---Lease holder was not owner of suit land and he had no right to claim compensation---.---Findings recorded by Referee Judge were against the statutory provisions---.---No notice was served upon the government who was owner of land in question---.---Judgment was passed against the government without affording an opportunity of hearing---.---Referee Judge had conducted proceedings against law---.---Referee Judge was bound to serve a notice upon government who was party in the line of respondents---.---Decree in favour of lease holder was nullity in the eye of law---.---Supreme Court could exercise inherent powers for doing complete justice without appeal by the government in the present circumstances---.---Lease holder had filed an undertaking that he would surrender the suit land in favour of government if it was required for a "public purpose"---.---Applicant-lease holder was not an aggrieved person to maintain a reference application---.---Reference application was not competent and decision/decree passed by the Referee Judge was nullity in the eye of law---.---Appeal was disposed of in circumstances. Mujahid Hussain Naqvi v. Director/Deputy Director Anti-Corruption and 4 others 2001 YLR 2642 and Ehtesab Bureau v. Rashid Ahmed Katal and 4 others 2011 SCR 512…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492