| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2017 SLG 147 2017 SLD 147 2017 CLC 119 |
Islamabad High Court
C.R.No. 105 of 2016, decided on 25th May, 2016. Date of hearing: 19th April, 2016.
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE
Syed Hasnain Ibrahim Kazmi and M. Akram Shaheen for Petitioner. Tariq Khushnood Qureshi for
Respondent.
C.R.No. 105 of 2016, decided on 25th May, 2016. Date of hearing: 19th April, 2016.
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE
Syed Hasnain Ibrahim Kazmi and M. Akram Shaheen for Petitioner. Tariq Khushnood Qureshi for
Respondent.
CH. MUHAMMAD ARSHAD
VS
. PTCL THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
Law:
Section:
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XVI, R.14 & O.XXVI, Rr. 9 & 10---Local commission---Report of---Scope---Summoning of local commission as a court witness---Application for summoning of local commission as a court witness was moved which was dismissed by the Trial Court---Validity---Court on its own motion had power to summon a person to give evidence at any stage of the proceedings if it was necessary to examine such person---Such power was discretionary and could be exercised by the court to ensure complete justice---Provisions of O. XVI, R.14, C.P.C. could not be used by a party to a litigation to summon any person---Report of local commission was prior in time to the framing of issues---Had the plaintiff given the name of local commission in the list of witnesses then he could have summoned the local commission through process of court---Plaintiff could not insist the court to exercise its powers under O.XVI, R.14, C.P.C. to summon the local commission as a court witness to give evidence---Report of local commission together with evidence recorded by him would be evidence in the suit---Such evidence or report ought to be taken into consideration by the court in coming to its conclusion, however same was not binding on the court---No party, in the present case, had filed objections to the report of local commission---Plaintiff had not filed any application under O.XXVI, R.10(2), C.P.C. for summoning of local commission---Report of local commission along with evidence submitted before the Trial Court should be treated as evidence in the suit in terms of O.XXVI, R.10(2), C.P.C.---Plaintiff could file an application under O.XXVI, R.10(2), C.P.C. for seeking permission to examine the local commission personally---Revision was dismissed accordingly. Mst. Hajra Begum through legal heirs v. Mst. Badar-un-Nissa and others PLD 2013 Sindh 417; Urman Jee v. District Judge, Kohat and 3 others PLD 1990 Pesh. 100 and Amna Bibi and 2 others v. Sona Khan and others 2012 YLR 2047 distinguished. Islamuddin and others v. Ghulam Muhammad and others PLD 2004 SC 633; Abdus Shakoor v. Muhammad Zafar Ullah Khan and others 2007 CLC 1661; Zaheer-ur-Din v. Mst.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492