| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 2121 2014 SLD 2121 2014 CLD 954 |
Lahore High Court
F.A.O. No.165 of 2007, herd on 24-09-2013.
AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN AND ABID AZIZ SHEIKH, JJ
Mughees Aslam Malik for Appellant. Sardar Riaz Karim for
Respondent No. 1. Suleman Bhatti for
Respondents Nos.4 to 6. Muhammad Waseem Shahab for
Respondent No. 7.
F.A.O. No.165 of 2007, herd on 24-09-2013.
AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN AND ABID AZIZ SHEIKH, JJ
Mughees Aslam Malik for Appellant. Sardar Riaz Karim for
Respondent No. 1. Suleman Bhatti for
Respondents Nos.4 to 6. Muhammad Waseem Shahab for
Respondent No. 7.
MUHAMMAD BAKHSH KHAN alias MUHAMMAD KHAN
VS
AKHTAR HUSSAIN and others
Law:
Section:
Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)-------S. 15---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXI, R.89---Auction proceedings---Sale, setting aside of---Property in question was owned by different persons and was mortgaged at more than one places---Bank, after giving notice to borrower, directly auctioned property in question under S.15 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Earlier, co-owners had filed objection against auction of property, which objection was dismissed by Banking Court and had attained finality---Subsequently, respondent filed objection petition under O. XXI, R. 89, C.P.C., on the ground of being one of the co-owners---Banking Court allowed objection petition and set aside auction of whole property---Validity---Property which was auctioned by bank, was mortgaged by various individuals including co-owners--- Objection petition against auction proceedings in favour of appellant was earlier challenged by co-owners and the same was dismissed by Banking Court and appeal was withdrawn, therefore, auction to the extent of co-owners had already attained finality---Such aspect of the matter was not taken into account by Banking Court while deciding objection petition of respondent and auction proceedings in respect of entire property were set aside---Banking Court was bound to decide fate of auction proceedings only to the extent of objection petitioner---High Court set aside the order passed by Banking Court and remanded the matter to Banking Court for decision afresh to the extent of share of appellant in suit property---Appeal was allowed accordingly. Muhammad Umer Rathore v. Federation of Pakistan 2009 CLC 257; Mir Wali Khan and another v. Manager, Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan, Muzaffargarh and another PLD 2003 SC 500; Izhar Alam Farooqi Advocate v. Sheikh Abdul Sattar Lasi and others 2008 SCMR 240 and Tehsil Nazim TMA, Okara v. Abbas Ali and 2 others 2010 SCMR 1437 ref. JUDGMENT ABID AZIZ SHEIKH, J.---This judgment will dispose of the instant appeal as well as the connected F.A.O. No.166 of 2007, as both the appeals are against the same impugned order dated 7-12-2007 and common…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492