Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 3195 2016 SLD 3195 2016 MLD 1238
Sindh High Court
Cr.R.A. No. S-136 of 2013, decided on 12th February, 2015.
SALAHUDDIN PANHWAR, JUSTICE
Ejaz A. Awan for Applicant. Shahid Ahmed Shaikh, A.P.G. for the State. Shaukat Ali Birhmani for
Respondents Nos. 2 to 8.

MUHAMMAD QASIM - --Applicant

VS

STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KHUDABAD, DISTRICT DADU AND 7 OTHERS --RespondentS

Law:

Section:

(a) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005) --------- ---------- Ss. 3 & 4 --------- Illegal possession of property --------- Complaint --------- Complaint by attorney --------- Parties to dispute co-owners of the property in question --------- Trial Court dismissed complaint filed by the attorney on the ground that attorney was not competent to file direct complaint under Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 --------- Validity --------- Complainant and accused jointly purchased the subject land on equal shares --------- Status of both the parties was that of 'joint owners' --------- Co-owner could seek restoration of possession from other co-owner subject to establishing his/her possession --------- Nothing was on record that land jointly purchased was partitioned --------- Complainant had not indicated as to from which area of joint holding the accused was in 'unlawful possession' or from which portion of such holding he had been dispossessed --------- Nothing was on record with regard to involvement of accused in illegal activities or their belonging to the gang of 'land grabbers or land mafia' --------- Mere words of one to be 'land grabbers or land mafia' would not be sufficient to dress him up with such status --------- Accused had filed a civil suit which was dismissed but appeal of the same was pending for adjudication --------- Civil courts were courts of ultimate jurisdiction for deciding civil right of the party and status of a document --------- Present dispute did not fall within the scope of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 --------- Complaint under the Act would be equated with that of an FIR --------- Attorney did not fall within the definition of "witness/complainant" --------- Attorney could not file the FIR or a criminal complaint --------- Anybody could bring the law into motion but not as an attorney --------- Revision was dismissed in circumstances. 2008 MLD 1702; PLD 2007 SC 423; PLD 2007 Pesh. 123; PLD 2007 Lah. 231; 2010 SCMR 1254; PLD 2006 Kar. 221; 2007 MLD 808 and 2007 PCr.LJ 891 ref. Habibullah v. Abdul Manan 2012 SCMR 1533 rel. (b) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005) --------- ----------Preamble --------- Scope --------- Scope of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492