Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 2104 2015 SLD 2104 2015 SCMR 1243
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 503 of 2006, decided on 24th March, 2015.(On appeal from judgment of Peshawar High Court, Peshawardated 20-2-2006 passed in R.F.A. No. 177 of 2003)
ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI, DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Qazi Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Sher Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record for Appellan. Wasim Sajjad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents

Dr. PIR MUHAMMAD KHANVsKHUDA BUKHSH and others

Law:

Section:

(a) Islamic Law-------Pre-emption---Suit for possession through pre-emption---Talb-i-Muwathibat and Talb-i-Ishhad ("talbs"), particulars of---Non-disclosure of material particulars of talbs in the pleadings---Lack of promptness in making talbs---Suit for possession through pre-emption was instituted by the pre-emptors on 25-2-1992, when there was no statutory law of pre-emption in force in the area where suit land was situated, and pre-emption proceedings were regulated under the general principles of Islamic Law of pre-emption---Pre-emptors submitted two lists of witnesses, first after the framing of issues, and second during post remand proceedings in the suit---Both lists contained names of two different sets of witnesses---Surprisingly, name of the two witnesses of Talb-i-Muwathibat and Talb-i-Ishhad did not appear in the first list of witnesses submitted by the pre-emptors---Even the second list of witnesses submitted by the pre-emptors did not contain name of one of the witnesses of Talb-i-Muwathibat and Talb-i-Ishhad, who only surfaced at the time of deposing in the witness box---Such fact alone was sufficient to show that introduction of their names as the witnesses of Talb-i-Muwathibat and Talb-i-Ishhad was an afterthought and for such reason alone names of said two witnesses were also withheld by the pre-emptors in their pleadings---Such admitted facts from the case record were fatal to the claim of the pre-emptors as regards their right of pre-emption under the general principles of Islamic Law---Evidence on record also showed that there were material contradictions as regards the pre-emptors' claim of acquiring knowledge of sale qua making Talb-i-Muwathibat and Talb-i-Ishhad, which shortcomings could not be lightly brushed aside---Pleadings of the pre-emptors in their suit lacked material particulars, which were required to be disclosed/unfolded in the plaint to give a fair chance to the vendee to put up his defence--- Apart from non-disclosure of the time, date and place of making Talb-i-Muwathibat and Talb-i-Ishhad, the names of the two witnesses of Talb-i-Ishhad were also not disclosed by the pre-emptors in their pleadings---Non-disclosure of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492