Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 512 2015 SLD 512 2015 PLD 239
Sindh High Court
High Court Appeals Nos. 160, 161, 162, 163 of 2014, decided on 4th July, 2014
MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR AND SHAHNAWAZ TARIQ, JJ
Rasheed A. Rizvi and Malik Naeem Iabal for Appellants. Nazakat Ali Tanwari for
Respondents

PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS, HOUSING AUTHORITY through Secretary and others

VS

MUHAMMAD AFSAR and others

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: O.XXIII,R.1,S.107,O.IX,R.8,O.XVII,R.3

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XXIII, R.1, S. 107, O.IX, R.8 & O.XVII, R.3---Withdrawal of suit---Principles---Power of appellate court regarding withdrawal of suit---Plaintiff had absolute right to withdraw the suit at any stage of proceedings; where plaintiff wanted to file fresh suit, permission of the court was required---Court could not proceed with the suit suo motu in the absence of plaintiff---Under O.IX, R.8, C.P.C. court could dismiss suit where plaintiff did not appear when the suit was called for hearing---No provision in C.P.C. required the court to refuse permission to withdraw suit or compel plaintiff to proceed with the suit---Under O.XXIII, R.1, C.P.C. withdrawal of suit was complete when the court was informed to that effect---Where withdrawal of suit was unconditional, prayer for withdrawal could not be rejected and in the absence of any adjudication of rights no question of a speaking order could arise---Court could not limit, circumvent, abridge or destroy right to withdraw the suit---Order XXIII, R.1, C.P.C. conferred right on plaintiff to withdraw suit at any time after the institution against all or any of the defendants---Plaintiff could withdraw or abandon the entire or part of the claim---Where preliminary decree had created interest of third party, right to withdraw suit could not be exercised without consent of the third party---In suits for administration, accounts or partition plaintiff could not be allowed to withdraw suit where defendant had acquired a right in the subject matter and such right was likely to be defeated by withdrawal of the suit---Where purpose of withdrawal of proceedings was only to prevent the court from passing an order undoing a wrong or injustice done to a party or to deprive the Government or public functionary of receiving or recovering the public dues or to defeat the ends of justice, the court could decline withdrawal of suit---Appeal was continuation of suit---Under S.107, subsection 2, C.P.C. appellate court was competent to grant permission to withdraw suit as appellate court had all the powers of court of original jurisdiction/Trial Court---Appeals were accepted. Mrs. Afroz Shah…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492