| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1974 SLG 197 1974 SLD 197 1974 SCMR 346 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 44 of 1973, decision dated: 3-10-1.973.(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, made on the 24th of August 1972, in Writ Petition No. 551/R of 1972)
MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI AND ANWARUL HAQ, JJ
Iftikharul Haq Khan, Advocate instructed by Wajid Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 44 of 1973, decision dated: 3-10-1.973.(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, made on the 24th of August 1972, in Writ Petition No. 551/R of 1972)
MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI AND ANWARUL HAQ, JJ
Iftikharul Haq Khan, Advocate instructed by Wajid Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents
ATTA MUHAMMAD
VS
TAJ MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHER
Law:
Section:
Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)--- S. 2 & Sched., Part I - Shop, transfer of-"Possession "Person, a mere licensee of an allottee-Has no right to claim transfer. ORDER ANWARUL HAQ, J.-This petition for special leave to appeal is directed against an order made by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court on 21-11-'J2, whereby a constitution petition filed by Atta Mohammad relating to the transfer of an evacuee shop situate in Mianwali District was dismissed in limine. It is admitted that the petitioner is a local, whereas the respondent, Tai Mohammad, is a claimant displaced person. The shop in dispute was transferred to the respondent against his C. S. form by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner on 27-9-1959. The petitioner did not file any appeal or revision against this order, but instead made a miscellaneous application to the Deputy Settlement Commissioner on 19-5-1960 for the transfer of the shop on the ground that he had converted the same into a hotel. The Deputy Settlement Commissioner submitted the case to the Additional Settlement Commissioner asking for permission to review the previous order of transfer in favour of the respondent. However, the matter was directly dealt with by the learned Settlement Commissioner who found the petitioner entitled to the transfer of the property on the ground of its conversion into a hotel. Aggrieved by this order of the Settlement Commissioner, the respondent Taj Mohammad invoked the writ jurisdiction of the High Court, which remanded the case to the Settlement Commissioner for a fresh decision. On remand, the learned Settlement Commissioner, by his order dated 17th July 1972, restored the first order of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner dated the 27th of September 1959, with the result that the shop once again stood transferred to the respondent. It was now the turn of the petitioner to approach the High Court, but he failed on the ground that he…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492