| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 3820 2016 SLD 3820 2016 YLR 1836 |
High Court (AJ&K)
Writ Petition No. 246 of 2014, decided on 28th October, 2015.
SARDAR ABDUL HAMEED KHAN, JUSTICE
Amjad Siddique for Petitioner. Miss Kousar Awan for
Respondent No.2.
Writ Petition No. 246 of 2014, decided on 28th October, 2015.
SARDAR ABDUL HAMEED KHAN, JUSTICE
Amjad Siddique for Petitioner. Miss Kousar Awan for
Respondent No.2.
SADAQ MEHMOOD
VS
. JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT NO.1 AND another
Law:
Section:
(a) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act (XI of 1993)----- -----S. 5, Sched, Ss. 8, 9 & 14-----Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), S. 44-----Writ petition-----Maintainability-----Suit for dissolution of marriage-----Ex-parte proceedings, setting aside of-----Appearance and filing of written statement by the defendant-----Limitation-----Interim order----- Appeal----- Discretion, exercise of-----Scope-----Husband filed application for setting aside ex-parte proceeding but same was dismissed-----Validity-----Defendant could appear and file written statement within fifteen days of service-----Proclamation was made on 21-09-2013 and defendant was authorized to appear and file written statement till 06-10-2013-----Any action against the defendant before the expiry of time limit was not warranted under the law-----Ex-parte proceedings were not permissible in the present case before 06-10-2013-----Application filed by the defendant on 22-10-2013 for setting aside ex-parte proceedings was within time-----Impugned order passed by the Family Court was without any legal force-----Said order was interim one against which neither appeal nor revision would lie-----Discretion exercised by the Family Court dismissing the application for setting aside ex-parte proceedings was not in accordance with law and same could be looked into by exercising constitutional power-----Discretionary orders were not immune from judicial review-----Writ petition against such interim order was competent in circumstances-----Ex-parte order passed by the Family Court was set aside-----Defendant was directed to file written statement before the Family Court within fifteen days-----Family Court was directed to decide the case on merits after hearing the parties within the stipulated period first deciding the territorial jurisdiction-----Writ petition was allowed in circumstances. Rafhat Rashid and 7 others v. Ghulam Sarwar 2000 YLR 2523; Mohsin Shah v. Qaseema Wahid 1995 MLD 1032; Mst. Shereen Masood v. Malik Naseem Hassan, Judge Family Court, Lahore and another 1985 CLC 2758 and Mst. Shahnaz Bibi and 2 others v. Munawar Din 2005 SCR 409 rel. (b) Azad Jammu and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492