Law:

Section:

Constitution of Pakistan.......... .......... Article 199..........Constitutional petition..........Necessary and proper parties..........Application contending that applicant was necessary and proper party, and the petitioner was, therefore, supposed to implead the applicant as one of the respondents in constitutional petition..........Validity..........High Court observed that presence of the applicant would help the Court to reach just conclusion and no prejudice would be caused to the other parties if the applicant was impleaded in the array of the respondents..........Petitioner was directed to file amended constitutional petition after impleading the applicant as one of the respondents..........Application was allowed in circumstances. 1989 SCMR 205; PLD 2013 Sindh 83; 2010 MLD 1000; 2010 YLR 1666; 1998 CLC 1576; 2015 SCMR 1257; 1995 SCMR 650 and 2002 YLR 3433 ref. ORDER C.M. No.4034 of 2015 NOOR-UL-HAQ N. QURESHI, JUSTICE.......... Engro Polymer and Chemicals Ltd. ("Engro"), public company Ltd. by shares, duly incorporated under the laws of Pakistan, having its registered office at Harbour Front Building, High Court-3, Marine Drive Block 4, Clifton, Karachi has preferred the above C.M for impleading it as party/respondent. It is asserted that the applicant is a manufacturer of PVC resin, which is a raw material used in the manufacture. The applicant is a necessary and proper party in this writ petition on the grounds mentioned in the petition. It is added that Engro should have been made party to the writ petition by the Association itself. The petitioner has not fully state the entire background in the writ petition. If the application…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492