| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2017 SLG 1733 2017 SLD 1733 2017 PLC 1393 |
Islamabad High Court
I.C.A. No. 594 of 2012, decision Date : 31-01-2017, heard on: 13-12-2016
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE, ATHAR MINALLAH, JUSTICE
Faisal Siddiqui for Appellant. Hashmat Ali Habib for
Respondent No. 1. Ehsan Ahmad Khawaja for
Respondent No. 4. Sultan Mazhar Sher for
Respondent No. 5. M.A. Rehman Qureshi for
Respondent No. 8.
I.C.A. No. 594 of 2012, decision Date : 31-01-2017, heard on: 13-12-2016
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE, ATHAR MINALLAH, JUSTICE
Faisal Siddiqui for Appellant. Hashmat Ali Habib for
Respondent No. 1. Ehsan Ahmad Khawaja for
Respondent No. 4. Sultan Mazhar Sher for
Respondent No. 5. M.A. Rehman Qureshi for
Respondent No. 8.
SYED AZHAR ABBAS JAFRI
VS
HBFC WORKMEN UNION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Law: Banks (Nationalization) Act, 1974
Section: 11,11(12)(c)
Law: Banks (Nationalization) (Amendment) Act, 2011
Section: Preamble
Banks (Nationalization) Act (XI of 1974)--- ----S. 11(12)(c)---Banks (Nationalization) (Amendment) Act (XXIV of 2011), Preamble---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), S.199(3)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Appointment of Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of a Corporation controlled by Government---Scope---Appointment of employee (a foreign national) was declared as not in accordance with law and benefit derived by him were directed to be recovered---Validity---Federal Government nominated the respondent employee as Chief Executive Officer for a period of three years---Board of Directors of the Corporation confirmed the said nomination---Employee's three-year tenure expired in January, 2012---Retiring Chief Executive should continue to perform his function until his successor was appointed unless non-appointment of his successor was due to any fault on his part or his office was expressly terminated---Employee continued to perform duties as Chief Executive of the Corporation until the impugned was passed by the Single Judge of the High Court---General provisions pertaining to management of Banks contained in S.11 of Banks (Nationalization) Act, 1974 were no longer applicable to the Corporation after enactment of Banks (Nationalization) (Amendment) Act, 2011---Employee, in question, was appointed prior to enactment of Banks (Nationalization) (Amendment) Act, 2011---Appointment of employee was unlawful as same was in violation of S.11(12)(c) of Banks (Nationalization) Act, 1974---Employee did work during the period for which he was appointed as Chief Executive Officer---Employee was not to be burdened with the direction for the recovery of benefits to which he would be otherwise entitled---Intra court appeal was allowed to the extent of recovery of benefits derived by the employee in circumstances. Engineer-in-Chief Branch v. Jalaluddin PLD 1992 SC 207; Administrator, District Council v. Ghulab Khan 2001 SCMR 1320; Asad Ali Alvi v. Secretary, Government of Punjab 2007 PLC (C.S.) 924; Shaukat Ali v. District Government, through Nazim/Chairman Selection Committee 2005 PLC (C.S.) 790; Khalida Parveen v. District Education…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492