| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 1709 2015 SLD 1709 (2015) 372 ITR 111 |
Delhi High Court
IT Appeal Nos. 551 & 553 of 2013, FEBRUARY 5, 2015
SANJIV KHANNA AND V. KAMESWAR RAO, JJ.
N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel , Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel and Juoy James, Adv. for the Appellant.Rakesh Gupta and Rishabh Kapoor, Adv. for the
Respondent.
IT Appeal Nos. 551 & 553 of 2013, FEBRUARY 5, 2015
SANJIV KHANNA AND V. KAMESWAR RAO, JJ.
N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel , Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel and Juoy James, Adv. for the Appellant.Rakesh Gupta and Rishabh Kapoor, Adv. for the
Respondent.
IT Appeal Nos. 551 & 553 of 2013, FEBRUARY 5, 2015Commissioner of Income Tax Iv.AAR ESS Exim (P.) Ltd.
Law:
Section:
ORDER Sanjiv Khanna, J. - These two appeals by the Revenue relating to assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 require adjudication on the following substantial question of law: "Whether the respondent assessee is entitled to benefit under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as he was engaged in manufacture or production of an article or thing?" 2. These appeals arise from a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) dated 18th April, 2013. 3. The respondent assessee is a company engaged in the business of manufacture, trading and export of engineering goods etc. and also has a factory located in Noida Export Processing Zone, Uttar Pradesh. The said unit is a 100% export oriented and located in customs bounded area. 4. For the assessment year 2007-08, the respondent assessee had filed return declaring loss of Rs.4,11,190/- and had claimed deduction/exemption under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) on profit of Rs.69,69,429/- from the Noida Unit. The Assessing Officer did not allow deduction under Section 10B on the ground that the assessee had not manufactured any goods in the Noida Unit. He referred to reply received from R.N. Metals, Jaipur, M/s Sustul Engg. Corp. Mumbai, M/s Chanderpur Works Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) to the effect that they had manufactured and exported various goods on behalf of respondent assessee. He observed that the aforesaid letters showed that the assessee itself had not undertaken manufacturing activities. The assessing officer noticed that the asessee had incurred electricity expenditure of Rs.19,771/- during the year and Rs.2,27,694/- in the previous year, though they had turnover of Rs.18.92 lacs and had shown opening stock of work in progress of Rs.1.6 crores. The total turnover from Noida unit as declared was Rs.6,19,35,990/-. 5. For the assessment year 2008-09, the assessment order is more detailed and elaborate. The assessee had filed return declaring NIL income and had claimed exemption/deduction under Section 10B of Rs.12,17,41,816/-. The assessee had claimed that they had earned exempt income as they had carried out upgradation of cement plant in Zambia and also received…