| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 22 2014 SLD 22 2014 SCMR 45 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No.669-L of 2013, decision dated: 28-10-2013,hearing DATE : 9-10-2013
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CHIEF, JUSTICEJAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, JUSTICEGULZAR AHMED, JUSTICE
Hamid Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Imtiaz Rashid Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court and Waqar Rana, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant.Syed Iftikhar Hussain Gillani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Mobeen ud Din Qazi, Advocate Supreme Court and M
Civil Appeal No.669-L of 2013, decision dated: 28-10-2013,hearing DATE : 9-10-2013
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CHIEF, JUSTICEJAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, JUSTICEGULZAR AHMED, JUSTICE
Hamid Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Imtiaz Rashid Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court and Waqar Rana, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant.Syed Iftikhar Hussain Gillani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Mobeen ud Din Qazi, Advocate Supreme Court and M
MALIK UMAR ASLAM VSMRS. SUMAIRA MALIK AND OTHERS
Law: Representation of the People Act, 1976
Section: 67
(a) Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976)---Ss. 67(1A) & 67(1)---Interpretation of S.67, Representation of the People Act, 1976---Election Tribunal---Adjudication of Election petitions----Expeditious disposal of election petitions---Mandatory nature of S.67(1A) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976---Timely decisions were not being taken by the Election Tribunals; because, inter alia, Election Tribunals were ordinarily presided by Judges of the High Courts who remain unable to conclude matters expeditiously on account of their other judicial commitments, or because of delaying tactics employed by respondents who, having been declared as returned candidates, enjoyed the status of Members of the National or Provincial Assemblies---Such delays in disposal of election petitions before the Tribunal in fact deprived a large number of electors of the constituency to have their due representation in the elected Houses, particularly in those matters where a whole term had been enjoyed by a winning candidate, who may later turn out to be disqualified on any count---Such delay caused the people of constituency to be represented by a person who was not duly elected, which clearly negated the principle of a democratic system of Government---Wisdom existed in fixing the period for decision of such cases, namely, that there should be no uncertainty for the persons, who had been elected or who had challenged the election before the Tribunal or the Court and after expeditious disposal of the same and such persons should consume all their energies for the welfare of the people whom they represent, instead of wasting time in pursuing such matters before the Courts---Mandatory requirement of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 was that the Election Tribunal shall proceed with the trial of the election petition on a day-to-day basis and the decision thereof shall be taken within four months from its receipt as provided under S.67(1A) of the Act---Legal duty had, therefore, been cast upon the Election Tribunal to reach a conclusion expeditiously by following stringent/coercive measures of imposing a cost and assigning the reasons if cases were adjourned…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492