Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 1214 2016 SLD 1214 2016 PTD 2413
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
S.T.A. No. 79/PB of 2014, decided on 26th May, 2015. Date of hearing: 16th April, 2015.
, JAVID IQBAL, CHAIRMAN AND M. MAJID QURESHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Hussain Ahmed Sherazi for Appellant. Shuaib Sultan and Naseer Ahmed, D.Rs. for
Respondent.

Messrs PESHAWAR ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, WAPDA HOUSE, PESHAWAR

VS

The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., PESHAWAR

Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990

Section: 2(20),3,7,11,46

Law: Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007

Section: 88

Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)-- -Ss. 2(20), 3, 7, 11 & 46-Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007, R. 88-H-SRO No,678(I)/2007, dated 6-7-2007-SRO No.480(I)/2007, dated 9-6-2007-Short payment of sales tax-Adjustment of input tax- Assessing Officer, observed that company /registered person had paid short sales tax for the period under reference-Assessing Officer raised demand of tax along with penalty and default charges-Validity- Department contended that the company charged and collected sales tax from Steel Melters under R.58-H of Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007, but failed to deposit the same into the Government Treasury which was clear violation of law; as that levy was the final discharge of Sales Tax liability of the Steel Melters-Ordinarily sales tax was levied at the rate of 17% of the value of taxable supplies made by a registered person in the course of any taxable activity carried on by him under S.3(l) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990-Such amount was termed as "output tax"-Section 7 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, had provided that the tax liability of a registered person, would be determined after deducting the input tax paid by the registered person from output tax collected by such person on the taxable supplies made by him-Claim of said output tax was statutory right of a registered person under S. 7 of Sales Tax Act, 1990-Such was a value added tax, which was levied at every stage, the value addition took place at the same supply-Such was, no more a one point levy; and the ultimate burden was passed on to the consumer-Company was entitled to claim adjustment of input tax to the extent of sales tax collected from all consumers, including the Steel Melters and Re-roller; however, it was not entitled to claim any input tax adjustment in respect of sales tax collected from said class of taxpayer under R.58-H of Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007-Assertion of company that it had collected only the fixed sales tax from Steel melters, was not understandable, because company was obliged to collect both the taxes-While fact could be ascertained by obtaining data from the company, and the steel melters and re-rollers-Tribunal observed that it was…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492