Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 1991 2016 SLD 1991 2016 SCP
Supreme Court of Pakistan
(1) Civil Review Petition No. 142 of 2015 (2) Constitution Petition No. 104 of 2011, 24/08/2016
MR., JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI, C.J, MR., JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED AND MR., JUSTICE TARIQ PARVEZ, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Engineers Study Forum (Registered) & Another

VS

The Federation Of Pakistan, Etc.

Law:

Section:

Keywords: Result: Review Petition Dismissed JUDGMENT GULZAR AHMED, J.-By this Civil Review Petition, the petitioners namely Engineers Study Forum (Regd) and another have sought review of the judgment dated 08.01.2015 passed in C.P.No.32/1996, 45/1998, 37/2000, 44/2002, 39/2005, 104/2011, Civil Petition No.887/2008 and Crl.Org. Petition No.91/2006. This Review petition has been filed only by the petitioners of C.P.No.104/2011. On 18.7.2016 this Review Petition had come up for hearing before the Court. Learned Sr. ASC for the review petitioners was heard and that after having heard the learned Sr. ASC for review petitioners at sufficient length, the Court passed the order of reserving the judgment and asked the learned Sr. ASC for petitioners to file written submissions, which the learned Sr. ASC for the review petitioners has filed. He has also filed a CMA No.5135/2016 praying for grant of adequate opportunity of hearing. We have considered the submissions of Mr. A.K.Dogar,learned Sr. ASC for the review petitioners. 4. We would first take up CMA No.5135 of 2016 of review petitioners in which their counsel purports to seek opportunity of adequate hearing as he has asserted in the application that his 90% arguments remained unheard by the Court and has referred to the case of Imranullah v. The Crown [PLD 1954 FC 123]. The case cited is altogether distinguishable from the features of present case as it related to the hearing of Criminal Appeal before the High Court and it was complained by the counsel for appellant that he was not given opportunity of hearing by the High Court. Their lordships in the Federal Court gave hearing to the counsel for the appellant and ultimately dismissed the appeal and maintained the judgment of High Court. The present case before us is under review jurisdiction of this Court and looking at the limited scope of review jurisdiction the Court has given to the review petitioners adequate opportunity of hearing and though the Court has reserved the judgment but has also allowed the petitioners' counsel to give written submissions which opportunity of filing of written submissions has been availed and thus there is hardly any justification…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492