Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 1744 2015 SLD 1744 (2015) 370 ITR 511

I.T.T.A. No. 266 of 2003, NOVEMBER 5, 2014
L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND CHALLA KODANDA RAM, JJ.
S.R. Ashok for the Appellant. B.S. Shivaji for the
Respondent.

Commissioner of INCOME TAX3, Hyderabad

v.

Shree Processors (P.) Ltd.

Law:

Section:

JUDGMENT L. Narasimha Reddy, J. - The respondent is an Industrial Undertaking, established in an area notified as Backward, under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act). It undertakes the activity of converting cotton pieces, known as cops into yarn. Depending upon the customer requirement, sometimes single yarn is made into double or multiple yarn threads. In its returns submitted for the assessment year 1992-1993, the respondent claimed certain deductions, referable to Sections 80HH and 80I of the Act. The Assessing Officer took the view that no process of manufacture whatever is undertaken by the respondent, and thereby, it is not entitled to claim deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Act. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the respondent carried the matter in appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Commissioner allowed the appeal, through order, dated 27.03.1996. Challenging the same, the department filed I.T.A.No.1309/Hyd/1996, before the Hyderabad Bench A of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal). The appeal was dismissed, through order, dated 30.08.2002. Hence, this further appeal under Section 260A of the Act. 2. Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, submits that, it is only when an activity of manufacture is undertaken that an assessee would qualify for deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Act, and that in the instant case, the assessee did not undertake any activity, except the one of making a single thread into double or multiple thread products. He contends that an activity of that nature cannot be treated as manufacture and the Assessing Officer has correctly denied the deductions. He has placed reliance upon the judgments of the Supreme Court in Collector of Central Excise v. Banswara Syntex Ltd.[1996] 11 SCC 55 and J.K. Cotton Spg. & Wvg. Mills Ltd. v. Union of India 1987 (Supp.) SCC 350. 3. Sri B.S.Shivaji, learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, submits that the process undertaken by his client is a compendious one, involving the manufacture of yarn from cops and that there was no basis for the Assessing Officer to deny the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492