| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1974 SLG 11 1974 SLD 11 1974 PLD 284 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No 82 of 1969, decision dated: 13th May 1974. dates of hearing : 23rd and 24th October 1973
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C, J., WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD AND SALAHUDDIN AHMED, JJ
Hameedullah Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Hamid Aslam Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Abdul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ch. Muhammad Zakaria Khalil, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
Civil Appeal No 82 of 1969, decision dated: 13th May 1974. dates of hearing : 23rd and 24th October 1973
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C, J., WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD AND SALAHUDDIN AHMED, JJ
Hameedullah Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Hamid Aslam Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Abdul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ch. Muhammad Zakaria Khalil, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE
Law: Income Tax Act, 1922
Section: 34
Law: Finance Act, 1957
Section: 12,5,7
Law: Business Profits Tax Act, 1947
Section: 14,11
(a) Business Profits Tax Act (XXI of 1947)----Ss. 14 & 11 read with Finance Act (I of 1957), S. 12, subsections (5) & (7) and Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), S. 34-Expression "shall apply with such modifications, if any, as may be prescribed" in S. 12(7) of Finance Act of 1957-Meaning-Repeal of S. 14 of Business Profits Tax Act, 1947 and application of S. 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 could not be said to have been postponed until modifications were made Section 14, Business Profits Tax Act repealed with immediate effect and simultaneously S. 34, Income-tax Act became part of Business Profits Tax Act, 1947. The question was whether by virtue of section 12(7) of the Finance _ Act, 1957 the provisions of section 34 applied of their own force without modifications or became applicable only after the modification. The High -Court had held that the provisions of section 34 of the Income-tax Act could not become operative until the Central Board of Revenue had carried out -the necessary modifications in the section. The Supreme Court in appeal ..disagreed with the High Court. Held: The words "shall apply with such modifications if any, as may be ;prescribed" in section 12(7) of the Finance Act, 1957, did not mean "that the repeal of section 14 of the Business Profits Tax Act and the application of section 34 of the Income-tax Act was postponed until modifications were made". Section 14 of the Business Profits Tax Act, was repealed "with immediate effect" and "simultaneously section 34 of the Income-tax Act .became part of the Business Profits Tax Act". Even so this, by itself, would not have affected pending proceedings if this was not an amendment of a purely procedural or machinery provision but the amendment was procedural in nature. Thus if the provisions of section 34 became substituted in the Business Profits Tax Act with effect from the date the Finance Act of 1957 came into force, and if they appertained to only the machinery provisions relating to the recovery of the tax then they also took effect retroactively and affected pending proceedings. The applicability of statutory amendments could not possibly have been made to depend upon modifications to be…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492