| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 583 2015 SLD 583 2015 MLD 171 |
Lahore High Court
F.A.Os. No. 51 and 52 of 2011, decided on 20th June, 2014
SHAHID, JAMIL KHAN, J
Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi for Appellant. Muhammad Irshad Rana for
Respondent
F.A.Os. No. 51 and 52 of 2011, decided on 20th June, 2014
SHAHID, JAMIL KHAN, J
Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi for Appellant. Muhammad Irshad Rana for
Respondent
Mst. NASIRA AFRIDI
VS
MUHAMMAD AKBAR
Law: Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963
Section: 17,2(g),2(j)
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 117
(a) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----S. 17---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 117---Ejectment petition---Maintainability---Denial of relationship of landlord and tenant by tenant---Burden of proof---Default in payment of rent---Ancestral property---Rent Controller, jurisdiction of---Payment of rent---Scope---Contention of landlord was that tenants had committed default in payment of rent whereas tenants had denied the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties---Ejectment petition was accepted by the Rent Controller---Validity---Alleged rented premises was occupied by the tenants in lieu of vacating ancestral property as co-sharer and same was not taken into possession as tenant---No evidence to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant was discussed in the impugned order---Burden of proof to establish the relationship of landlord and tenant was on the landlord---Issue with regard to relationship of landlord and tenant was framed without placing/noting burden of proof which was improper exercise of jurisdiction---Findings that tenants could not prove the relationship of landlord and tenant were against the principle of law of evidence and were not sustainable in the eye of law---Relationship of landlord and tenant did not exist between the parties---Landlord had failed to prove that tenants paid rent as a consideration for possession or occupation of the premises---Present application for eviction was not maintainable and Rent Controller had no jurisdiction in the matter---Eviction could not be sought before the Rent Controller without establishing the relationship of landlord and tenant---Payment of rent was sine qua non for the relationship of landlord and tenant---Findings recorded by the Rent Controller were reversed and impugned order was set aside---Eviction petition filed by the landlord was dismissed---Appeal was accepted in circumstances. Abdul Haque v. The State PLD 1996 SC 1 rel. (b) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----S. 2 (g)---"Landlord"---Meaning---Person entitled to receive rent in respect of any building whether on his own account or for the benefit of another person for the time being…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492