| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 598 2015 SLD 598 2015 YLR 53 |
High Court (AJ&K)
Civil Appeal No. 198 of 2007, decided on 29th March, 2013
SARDAR ABDUL HAMEED KHAN, J
Manzoor Hussain for Appellant. Nemo for
Respondents Nos. 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11, 16, 17, 20 and 21. Raja Hassan Akhtar for
Respondents Nos. 9, 10, 12 to 15, 18 and 19
Civil Appeal No. 198 of 2007, decided on 29th March, 2013
SARDAR ABDUL HAMEED KHAN, J
Manzoor Hussain for Appellant. Nemo for
Respondents Nos. 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11, 16, 17, 20 and 21. Raja Hassan Akhtar for
Respondents Nos. 9, 10, 12 to 15, 18 and 19
MAQSOOD KAUSAR
VS
REVENUE DEPARTMENT through Collector District MirPur and 91 others
Law: West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, (XVII of 1967)
Section: 172,53
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42
West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)--- ----Ss. 172 & 53---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Suit for declaration and correction of entries in the revenue record---Bar on jurisdiction of civil court--- Maintainability--- Scope--- Trial Court dismissed suit on the grounds that plaintiff had no cause of action and for want of jurisdiction which was upheld by the Appellate Court---Validity---Jurisdiction of civil court in matter of entries in revenue record had been excluded which would be within the exclusive jurisdiction of revenue officers---Contention of plaintiff was that she had short-fall of 14 marlas of land whereas possession of 11 marlas was prayed but plaint was silent with regard to remaining 3 marlas of land---Plaintiff was not clear about her actual cause/relief which was claimed for---Disputed land was Shamlat Deh for which suit for possession could not be filed in the civil court---Concurrent findings of facts recorded by the courts below could not be disturbed by the High Court, howsoever erroneous they might be---Findings recorded by the courts below being not erroneous, both the courts below had properly attended the points in controversy between the parties and had recorded correct and legal conclusion---Suit was not maintainable---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Sardar Khan v. Ghulam Hussain 2003 YLR 1788 rel. JUDGMENT SARDAR ABDUL HAMEED KHAN, J.---This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree of Additional District Judge Dudyal Camp Mirpur dated 5-9-2007, whereby the appeal filed by the present appellant was dismissed and the order of Civil Judge Mirpur dated 27-3-2006 was upheld. The precise facts culminating into the instant appeal are, that the present appellant filed a suit for declaration for correction of entries of revenue record. According to the averments made in the plaint, the plaintiff and pro forma-respondents Nos. 7 to 73 and 76 to 78 are the owners of land comprising Khasra No. 1064-old, measuring 5 kanals and 2 Marlas, situated in Village Sahng Tehsil Mirpur. It is further averred that during the recent settlement 1994-95, the Revenue Authorities made the above said Khasra number into…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492