| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 3477 2016 SLD 3477 2016 PLC 974 |
Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal, Punjab
SHAHID WAHEED, CHAIRMAN, FAISAL ZAMAN KHAN AND MUHAMMAD TARIQ ABBASI, MEMBERS
Hafiz Tariq Nasim for Appellant. Ishfaq Qayyum Cheema, Nasar Ullah Khan Niazi, D.R. and M.Shafique, Assistant for
Respondent.
SHAHID WAHEED, CHAIRMAN, FAISAL ZAMAN KHAN AND MUHAMMAD TARIQ ABBASI, MEMBERS
Hafiz Tariq Nasim for Appellant. Ishfaq Qayyum Cheema, Nasar Ullah Khan Niazi, D.R. and M.Shafique, Assistant for
Respondent.
KHIZAR HAYAT GONDAL
VS
LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE THROUGH REGISTRAR
Law:
Section:
(a) Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991)--- ---S. 5---Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), S.21--------Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.3---Judicial Officer (Civil Judge)---Adverse remarks recorded in the ACR---Expunction of---Pro forma promotion---Second representation--- Limitation--- Commencement of--- Adverse remarks recorded in the ACR of appellant were expunged and he was promoted as Senior Civil Judge---Appellant filed representation for considering him for promotion from the date when his batch-mates were promoted to the post---Said representation was deferred and appellant was promoted---Appellant filed another representation for considering him for the promotion to the post of Senior Civil Judge and then to the Additional District Judge along with his batch-mates which was dismissed---Contention of department was that initial representation was time- barred and subsequent representation as well as service appeal were not maintainable---Validity---Limitation for filing a representation accrued to the appellant from the date when his batch-mates were promoted as Senior Civil Judge, however, he did not agitate his grievance at that point of time---Appeal against adverse remarks was accepted on 26-02-2004 whereafter on 18-10-2004 he was promoted as Senior Civil Judge---During this period appellant did not file representation---Appellant could have filed departmental appeal within 60 days from 26-02-2004 when his remarks were expunged or from 18-10-2004 when he was promoted as Senior Civil Judge---Appellant preferred representation on 04-06-2005 which was beyond the period of limitation---Departmental representations filed by the appellant were not within time---Present appeal was not maintainable in circumstances---Point of limitation could be looked into by the Service Tribunal keeping in view S.21 of Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 read with S.3 of Limitation Act, 1908---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Syed Ashfaq Hussain Shah v. N.E.D. University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi and others 2007 SCMR 73; Messrs Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. v. Malik Murawat Hussain 2004 SCMR 527; Muhammad Boota v. The…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492