| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 2169 2016 SLD 2169 2016 YLR 393 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 1059 of 2011, heard on 03-02-2015.
ABDUL SAMI KHAN, JUSTICE AND SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE
Ms. Nighat Saeed Mughal for Appellant. Sahir Mehmood Bhatti for the Complainant. Tariq Javed, DPP for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 1059 of 2011, heard on 03-02-2015.
ABDUL SAMI KHAN, JUSTICE AND SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE
Ms. Nighat Saeed Mughal for Appellant. Sahir Mehmood Bhatti for the Complainant. Tariq Javed, DPP for the State.
HABIB KHYZER
VS
. THE STATE--Respondent
Law:
Section:
(a) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997)--- ----S. 7(c)(h)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324---Act of terrorism, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Previous enmity existed between the parties, and occurrence had taken place on the road side out of the District Courts premises---Offences under S.7(c) & (h) of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, were not attracted---Convictions and sentences recorded by the Trial Court under S.7(e)(h) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, were set aside, in circumstances. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S.324---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Incident was a daylight occurrence---Co-accused were acquitted, because effective firing was not attributed to them---Maxim "falsus in uno falsus in omnibus" had no universal application---Court was to sift the grain from the chaff---Credibility of eye-witnesses, could not be said to have been shattered due to acquittal of co-accused---All said eye-witnesses, were cross-examined at length, but their evidence could not be shaken---Said witnesses corroborated each other on all material aspects of the case to the extent of accused; their evidence (to the extent of accused) was straightforward, trustworthy and confidence inspiring---Medical evidence, had fully supported the ocular account, furnished by eye-witnesses---Alleged recovery of .30 bore pistol from the possession of accused in absence of positive report of Forensic Science Laboratory, was inconsequential---Prosecution had proved its case against accused beyond shadow of doubt through ocular account supported by medical evidence---Accused had failed to prove his defence plea and Trial Court had rightly discarded the plea with sufficient reasons---Accused had rightly been convicted by the Trial Court under S.324, P.P.C.---Conviction and sentence awarded by Trial Court to accused under S.324, P.P.C., were maintained, with benefit of S.382-B, Cr.P.C.---Appeal of accused to that effect, was dismissed. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE:------------ The instant Crl. Appeal No.1059-2011 has been filed by Habib Khyzer present appellant/ convict against judgment dated 21.07.2008 passed…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492