Law:

Section:

Civil service--- --------Absence from duty by the employee---Discontinuation of salary---Department directed District Accounts Officer for discontinuation of salary of petitioner-employee due to his absence from duty---Validity---Order for discontinuation of salary had not been challenged anywhere so far---Petitioner-employee might have challenged the same through writ petition filed by him prior to the present writ petition---No different circumstances had arisen giving any fresh cause of action for present writ petition---Department had right to take disciplinary action against the petitioner-employee if he remained absent from his duty---Impugned order was simple disciplinary action against the petitioner-employee and nothing new had been pointed out giving a new cause of action in the present petition---Petitioner-employee had not filed any application before the department explaining his position---Writ petition was dismissed in limine. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MUHAMMAD ALAM, JUSTICE:------------------ This is a writ petition, whereby, petitioner has sought the following remedy:- "It is therefore humbly prayed that. 1. The impugned discontinuation order dated 28/08/2015 passed by the respondent may kindly set-aside. 2. The respondent be directed to regularized the service of petitioner. 3. Any other relief." 2. In the petition in hand, petitioner has averred that the respondents appointed petitioner against the suit post on October 10, 2012 on contract basis, and on 02-10-2014, i.e., few days prior to expiration of the original contract period of services of petitioner, the same was extended for another year, i.e., till 10-10-2015. On 28-08-2015, respondents passed orders of termination of the extended period of contractual services of the petitioner. Feeling aggrieved from the same, petitioner filed a writ petition, i.e., W.P. No.82/2015, which was dismissed through order dated 01-09-2015. For ready reference, we reproduce order dated 01-09-2015 of this court on W.P. No.82/2015, which goes as under:- 01. 01-09-2015 Mr. Amjad Hussain Advocate, for the petitioner. Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner could not prima facie establish a case of…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492