| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 136 2014 SLD 136 2014 SCMR 147 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No.62 of 2011, decision dated: 2-10-2013.(On appeal from the judgment dated 22-3-2010 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal Islamabad in Appeal No.555(L)CS/2006)
TASSADUQ HUSSAIN, JILLANI, MIAN SAQIB NISAR AND MUHAMMAD ATHER SAEED, JJ
Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Jamroz Khan Afridi, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent. Mirza Waqas Rauf, DAG for
Respondent
Civil Appeal No.62 of 2011, decision dated: 2-10-2013.(On appeal from the judgment dated 22-3-2010 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal Islamabad in Appeal No.555(L)CS/2006)
TASSADUQ HUSSAIN, JILLANI, MIAN SAQIB NISAR AND MUHAMMAD ATHER SAEED, JJ
Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Jamroz Khan Afridi, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent. Mirza Waqas Rauf, DAG for
Respondent
ASIF YOUSAF
VS
SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, CBR, ISLAMABAD and others
Law: Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000)
Section: 3
Law: Service Tribunals Act, 1973
Section: 4
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 212(3)
(a) Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000)--- ----S. 3---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 212(3)---Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider; whether before converting minor penalty as suggested by Inquiry Officer into major penalty of dismissal from service, competent authority served the notice upon petitioner; and whether sufficient material was available before competent authority to pass order assailed before Service Tribunal. (b) Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000)--- ----S. 3---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4---Major penalty---Show cause notice, non-issuance of---Competent Authority imposed major penalty of dismissal from service to civil servant, against the recommendation of Inquiry Officer---Validity---Competent Authority was not bound by recommendation of Inquiry Officer regarding award of penalty to accused officer---While disagreeing and awarding higher penalty than recommended by Inquiry Officer, Competent Authority had to firstly provide opportunity of hearing to accused officer and secondly he had to pass a reasoned order with conscious application of mind---Although Inquiry Officer found civil servant to be negligent in his conduct and charge of 'mal-administration' was not proved, yet Competent Authority while awarding major penalty of dismissal from service found that there was substantial evidence on record to prove the charges---No reference to the evidence or material was available which found favour with Competent Authority to award major penalty of dismissal from service---No allegation was on record that accused civil servant was guilty of corruption or of financial gain---Supreme Court set aside the order passed by Competent Authority and remanded the matter to it for decision afresh after hearing the civil servant---Appeal was allowed. Khalid Mansoor v. Director FIA 2008 SCMR 1174 and Abid Hussain v. Chairman, NESCOM 2009 SCMR 1025 ref. ORDER TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, J.---Appellant while serving as Assistant Director, Directorate of Inspection and Internal Audit, Customs and Excise, Lahore, was proceeded against on charges of misconduct and in terms of the show…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492