| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 2738 2016 SLD 2738 2016 PCRLJ 657 |
Peshawar High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 158 of 2015, decided on 17th December, 2015. Date of hearing: 17th December, 2015.
HAIDER ALI KHAN, JUSTICE
Mian Muhammad Riaz for Appellants. Sabir Shah, A.A.G. for the State. Mukaram Shah for the Complainant.
Criminal Appeal No. 158 of 2015, decided on 17th December, 2015. Date of hearing: 17th December, 2015.
HAIDER ALI KHAN, JUSTICE
Mian Muhammad Riaz for Appellants. Sabir Shah, A.A.G. for the State. Mukaram Shah for the Complainant.
AJAB KHAN AND ANOTHER - --AppellantS
VS
STATE THROUGH ADDITIONAL ADVOCATEGENERAL AND ANOTHER - --Respondent
Law:
Section:
Penal Code (XLV of 1860) --------- ----------Ss. 496-A, 496-B & 34 --------- Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a woman, common intention --------- Appreciation of evidence --------- Prosecution version was that accused enticed away co-accused for the purpose of illegal marriage, despite the fact that Nikah of co-accused had already been effected with another person through Nikahnama --------- Alleged Nikahnama, had neither been signed or thumb impressed by the alleged husband of co-accused, nor by the co-accused --------- Purported Nikahnama, did not bear signature or thumb impression of alleged wali/attorney, who allegedly obtained consent of co-accused --------- Said Nikahnama was on a plain paper, and same did not carry signature or thumb impression of the witness --------- Prescribed Nikah Form was not used, nor the same was registered by the authority concerned --------- Status of alleged Nikahnama had become highly doubtful --------- Female (co-accused), according to prosecution version was 13/14 years of age at the time of alleged Nikah --------- No authentic document was on record to show her exact age --------- Accused persons had contracted marriage and out of said wedlock they had an offspring --------- Status of previous Nikah having already been held as doubtful, said offspring could not be left at the mercy of the society --------- Co-accused had a decree for dissolution of her marriage with her previous husband by exercising her right of puberty --------- Both accused persons (male and female) being adult had exercised their option to get married which was not prohibited by law --------- Impugned of the Trial Court, was set aside, accused were acquitted of the charge levelled against them and were released, in circumstances. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: HAIDER ALI KHAN, JUSTICE:---------- This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 06.6.2015 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Izafi Zilla Qazi, Swat at Kabal, delivered in case FIR No. 237 dated 29.11.2013 registered under sections 496-A/496-B/203/379/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Shah Dherai, District Swat whereby the appellants were convicted and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492