Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 2755 2016 SLD 2755 2016 PCRLJ 714
Lahore High Court
Criminal Revision No. 115 of 2015, decided on 13th November, 2015. Date of hearing: 13th November, 2015.
ERUM SAJAD GULL, JUSTICE
Sajid Hussain Bhatti for Petitioner. Muhammad Usman Riaz Gull for
Respondent No. 3. Sheikh Muhammad Umar for
Respondent No. 4. Ms. Ummul Baneen, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for the State.

MUHAMMAD SALEEM - ER

VS

THE STATE AND OTHERS --Respondent

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 337,338

Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)

Section: 16

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 201,302,365

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) --------- ----------Ss. 337 & 338 --------- Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 201, 302 & 365 --------- Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 16 --------- Causing disappearance of evidence, qatl-i-amd and abduction --------- Accomplice/approver, evidence of --------- Petitioner was aggrieved of the order passed by Trial Court whereby respondent accused was allowed to appear as approver during pendency of trial --------- Objection raised by petitioner was that he being co-accused of respondent accused, his case would be prejudiced if she was allowed to become an approver --------- Validity --------- As a rule of prudence, statement of approver should not be accepted as gospel truth and such person could not be trusted who had betrayed his or her own comrades --------- For safe administration of justice, conviction should never be based on the sole testimony of an approver without independent corroboration --------- Under Art.16 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, though conviction could be based on the sole statement of approver, but such was not advisable --------- Court had the discretion to pardon an accused and allow him to become an approver and in a case of hurt or qatl, if victim or legal heirs had no legal objection then co-accused could not challenge his pardon as he would be given ample opportunity to cross-examine the approver --------- Order passed by Trial Court was not illegal as respondent accused was pardoned and allowed to become an approver by competent court with the permission of legal heirs --------- High Court upheld the order passed by Trial Court as the same as well reasoned and legal --------- Revision was dismissed in circumstances. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and another v. Gul Hasan Khan PLD 1989 SC 633; Haider Hussain and others v. Government of Pakistan and others PLD 1991 FSC 139 and Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary, 7th Edition ref. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: ERUM SAJAD GULL, JUSTICE:---------- The Petitioner Muhammad Saleem through this criminal revision has assailed the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge Lahore dated 23-10-2014 whereby the application filed…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492