| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 1505 2015 SLD 1505 2015 MLD 267 |
Balochistan High Court
F.A.O. No.61 of 2014, decision dated: 28-06-2014, hearing DATE : 31st October, 2014
SHAKEEL AHMED BALOCH, J
Ms. Iram Mehmood for Appellants. Ajmal Khan Kakar for
Respondents
F.A.O. No.61 of 2014, decision dated: 28-06-2014, hearing DATE : 31st October, 2014
SHAKEEL AHMED BALOCH, J
Ms. Iram Mehmood for Appellants. Ajmal Khan Kakar for
Respondents
Messrs SINGER PAKISTAN LTD. through Director Personal and Administration and another
VS
NASIR ALI MEER and another
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)------O.XXI, R. 99 & Ss. 47, 94, 151, 2(2)---West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13---Ejectment of tenant---Compromise/settlement---Consent order---"Decree"---Scope---Non-drawing of decree-sheet---Effect---Landlords filed execution petition seeking ejectment of tenant from the demised premises which was dismissed---Contention of tenants was that eviction petition was disposed of in terms of compromise between the parties, that no decree-sheet was drawn and in absence of the same execution application was not maintainable---Validity---Rent Controller disposed of ejectment petition on the basis of settlement/consensus but due to omission/inadvertence did not draw the decree-sheet---Consent order did not fall within the definition of a "decree"---Only decree was executable but not a ---Execution petition filed by the landlords for execution of consent order was not maintainable as no decree-sheet was drawn in pursuance of the same---Objection raised by the tenants to the extent of non-maintainability of execution application was sustainable---Executing Court had wrongly rejected/overruled the objection raised by the tenants about maintainability of the execution petition which order was set aside---Rent Controller was directed to draw decree-sheet in pursuance of consent order---Landlords might file execution application afresh and tenants would be at liberty to raise/ file the available objections to the execution petition and if any objection was raised/filed then same should be decided by the Executing Court in accordance with law---Appeal was accepted in circumstances. Shaukat Ali v. Muhammad Sharif 2013 CLC 1558 rel. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ---S. 2(2)---"Decree"---Meaning---Decree would amount to formal expression of a decision conclusively determining the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ---S. 2(2)---"Decree"---Scope---Consent order did not fall within the definition of a decree--Only the decree was executable and not a . JUDGMENT SHAKEEL AHMED BALOCH, J.---This appeal under section 15 of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492