Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 2809 2016 SLD 2809 2016 PLC 225
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Quetta
Labour Appeal No. 06 of 2015, Dated: 9th September, 2015. Dates of hearing: 19th, 27th August and 2nd September, 2015.
ABDULLAH BALOCH, MEMBER
Sarfaraz Ahmed Sheikh for Appellants. Najam-ud-Din Mengal for
Respondent No.1 Abdul Sattar Khan for
Respondent No.3.

KHADIM HUSSAIN BHATTI AND ANOTHER

VS

SERENA HOTEL LABOUR UNION THROUGH PRESIDENT AND 3 OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Balochistan Industrial Relations Act (XIII of 2010)--- ----Ss. 55 & 77---Embezzlement or misappropriation of funds of the Labour Union---Respondent/Newly elected President of Labour Union in the establishment, after taking charge of his office, asked the appellants/former union representatives, to hand over the record and books of account lying with them for relevant period, but the appellants were reluctant to hand over the same; it was alleged that despite the direction of Registrar, Trade Unions, appellants had not provided the record to the complainant---Complainant, had further alleged that a huge amount had been embezzled and misappropriated by the appellants being former office bearers of the Union---On filing complaint by the respondent, before the Labour Court, issues were framed, evidence was recorded and Labour Court vide impugned order allowed the complaint---Moot question between the parties was issue regarding misappropriation of Union funds by the appellants/former union representatives---Parties produced witnesses in proof of their respective claims---Witness produced by appellants, had denied the allegations levelled against them by the respondent stating that they had properly maintained the record and filed return to the Registrar, Trade Unions---Said portion of deposition of the witness, was nowhere confronted or denied by the respondent, which amounted admission of the same by the respondent---Said witness, had further deposed that earlier to that inquiry, another inquiry on the same allegation was conducted, wherein matter between the parties was amicably settled---Record showed that it could safely be said that inquiry conducted in the case of the appellants was defective in nature; and findings of the report could not straightaway made out a case of embezzlement or misrepresentation---Issue of embezzlement which was not proved, was wrongly decided by the Trial Court---Material illegalities and regularities were found in the record, which required thorough, impartial inquiry for fixing responsibilities after providing full and fair opportunities to the parties---Impugned passed by the Labour Court, was entirely based on the findings…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492