| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 2782 2015 SLD 2782 2015 PLJ 283 |
Lahore High Court
W.P. No. 30935 of 2014 and C.M. No. 2949 of 2014, decided on 28.11.2014.
SHEZADA MAZHAR, J.
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
W.P. No. 30935 of 2014 and C.M. No. 2949 of 2014, decided on 28.11.2014.
SHEZADA MAZHAR, J.
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
TARIQ FAREED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through its Secretary, Ministry of Inter Provincial Co-ordination, Lahore and 2 others--Respondents
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Civil Procedure Code, (V of 1908), O. I, R. 10--Constitutional Petition--Constitution of PCB--Without disclosing facts had challenged once again provision of PCB constitution--Application filed u/O. I, Rule 10, CPC was treated as writ petition--Not party to earlier proceedings was of no significance--Petition was dismissed with cost--Validity--If such reprehensible conduct is ignored as in present case, Court would be failing in its duty to protect interest of bona fide litigants and its own process--Petitioner and other litigants will exercise utmost care in future and respect rights of bona fide litigants, who are actual stakeholders of justice system. [P. 286] A Order At the very out-set, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he does not want to press the writ petition. In this view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 2. CM No. 2949/2014 has been filed by the applicant namely Haseeb Ullah Shahid son of Abdul Majeed, President Muslim Gymkhana Cricket Club, Bughdadi Park Gulberg-A, Faisalabad under order 1 Rule 10, CPC for becoming party to the present writ petition. 3. When the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the main petition, the learned counsel for applicant requested that his application under Order 1 Rule 10, CPC be treated as separate writ petition. He further states that he has already affixed requisite Court fee on the application, therefore, there is no legal impediment in the way of this Court to treat the application of the petitioner as independent writ petition. 4. On the request of learned counsel for the applicant, the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10, CPC is treated as writ petition. Office is directed to number it accordingly. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner was asked to argue the petition. He submits that Pakistan Cricket Board constitution has been impugned in the writ petition. He further states that the petitioner is aggrieved of the different clauses of the constitution of PCB wherein the restrictions have been made on the independence of the election commission of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492