| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 2030 2016 SLD 2030 2016 PLJ 208 |
Lahore High Court
R.F.A. No. 626 of 2006, heard on 21.12.2011. Heard on: 21.12.2011.C
RAUF AHMAD SHEIKH, JUSTICE, ABDUL WAHEED KHAN, JUSTICE
Mr. Muhammad Hanif Niazi, Advocate for Appellant. Barrister Armughan Ashfaq, Advocate for
Respondents.
R.F.A. No. 626 of 2006, heard on 21.12.2011. Heard on: 21.12.2011.C
RAUF AHMAD SHEIKH, JUSTICE, ABDUL WAHEED KHAN, JUSTICE
Mr. Muhammad Hanif Niazi, Advocate for Appellant. Barrister Armughan Ashfaq, Advocate for
Respondents.
MUHAMMAD SARWAR BHATTI
VS
M/S. DAEWOO CORPORATION THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SECTIONI, SHEIKHUPURA AND 2 others--RespondentS
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 2,9
Res-judicata---.--- ---.---Scope---.---Any remark passed against the successful party does not operate as res judicata. Octroi Tax---.--- ---.---Suit for recovery of octroi tax or in alternative damages---.---No specific amount was claimed---.---Maintainability---.---Octroi tax was leviable from outside within limits of town committee---.---Exempted---.---Jurisdiction of Civil Court---.---Recovery so agent cannot effect---.---Validity---.---At time of execution of contract, appellant was aware of concession given due to importance of project but in spite of it, he voluntarily agreed to its terms---.---An agent/lessee has to act under instructions, directions and supervision of the principal/lessor---.---Respondent never claimed the payment of the octroi fee from Daewoo Company---.---Appellant being its agent, therefore, could have not lawfully made the demand---.---Findings of trial Court are, therefore, unexceptionable and do not for any interference---.---Appellant was not entitled to recover a sum from Daewoo then a decree for recovery of that amount as damages be passed against Daewoo---.---Appellant can claim damages by invoking arbitration clause from respondent---.---Finding was not set aside by High Court. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)---.--- ---.---O. VII, R. 2---.---Octroi tax---.---Suit for recovery of octroi tax or in alternative damages---.---No specific amount was claimed---.---Entitlement of---.---Validity---.---Appellant/plaintiff had not claimed any specific amount allegedly due from M/s. Daewoo to him or damages caused to him for non-payment of octroifee---.---Order VII Rule 2, CPC provides that where plaintiff seeks recovery of money, plaint shall state precise amount claimed---.---Appellant/plaintiff had himself voluntarily entered into contract---.---He had agreed that he would have same rights, which vest in Town Committee---.---Town Committee, does not claim payment from company so appellant/plaintiff is also estopped by his conduct from raising demand. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)---.--- ---.---O. I, R. 9---.---Non joinder and mis-joinder---.---No specific amount was claimed as octroi tax---.---Appellant/plaintiff has…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492