| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 2950 2016 SLD 2950 2016 YLR 2476 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. No. 362-J of 2012 and Capital SentenceReference No. 63-T of 2010, decided on 9th April, 2015. DATEof hearing: 9th April, 2015.
SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI AND MAZHAR IQBAL SIDHU, JUSTICE
Humaira Kaisar and Sheeba Kaisar for Appellants.Ch. Nasir Ahmad Jaura for the Complainant.Munir Ahmad Sail, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. No. 362-J of 2012 and Capital SentenceReference No. 63-T of 2010, decided on 9th April, 2015. DATEof hearing: 9th April, 2015.
SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI AND MAZHAR IQBAL SIDHU, JUSTICE
Humaira Kaisar and Sheeba Kaisar for Appellants.Ch. Nasir Ahmad Jaura for the Complainant.Munir Ahmad Sail, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State.
AHMAD SHERVSTHE STATE
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 109,148,149,302,376,365-B
Law: Anti Terrorism Act, 1997
Section: 7(a)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)- ---.---Ss. 302 (b) & 376---.---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVIL of 1997), S. 7 (a)---.---Qatl-i-amd and rape--Appreciation of Evidence---.---Multiple murders-Sentence, reduction in-- Complainant filed private complaint against twenty accused persons of the occurrence in which five persons were murdered--Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him to death while acquitted the remaining nineteen co-accused persons---.--- Validity---.---Empties were taken into possession on 09-01-2007 whereas gun was taken into possession 16-01-2007 and both gun as well as empties were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory on 20-01-2007---.---Such dispatch to Forensic Science Laboratory reduced the evidentiary value of report of Forensic Science Laboratory and had become inconsequential---.---Trial Court had already given premium to a number of persons after thrashing the whole evidence and only the sentence of death of accused remained in field---.---Investigating Officer while appearing in witness box admitted that innocent persons were arrayed as accused---.--- Whole occurrence was the outcome of miscarriage of "Watta-Satta" marriages which was very common in the society although both the parties were closely related to each other---.---Accused acted under the impulse of love with a woman, if it was considered with such materials within the ambit of diminished liability and if such aspect was borrowed from the homicide---.---Provisions of Ss.302(b) & 376 P.P.C. and S. 7(a) of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 empowered the Court to pass a sentence upon an accused subject to proof of the case upto imprisonment for life---.---High Court maintained the conviction of the accused but the quantum of sentences inflicted upon the accused under all charges were reduced from death sentence to imprison¬ment for life---.---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. Juma Khan v. The State PLD 2003 Lah. 60 rd. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: MAZHAR IQBAL SIDHU, JUSTICE:---.------ Ahmad Sher, appellant in the appeal, as mentioned above, has impugned the punishing judgment handed down by the .earned Judge, Anti-Terrorism- Court, Faisalabad on 06.09.2010, whereby after having been…