Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 662 2015 SLD 662 2015 YLR 450
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 141 and Criminal Revision No. 141 of 2008, heard on 20th June, 2013
SHAHID HAMEED DAR, J
Nasir Mehboob Tiwana for Appellant. Muqadass Tahira, Additional Prosecutor General Punjab for the State. Malik Shafqat Rasool Gorchha for the Complainant (in Criminal Revision No. 141 of 2008)

MUHAMMAD IQBAL

VS

The STATE

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 302(b),302(c)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b) & 302(c)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in---Sudden provocation---Trespassing---Deceased, on the day of occurrence, went to Ihata of father of accused as trespasser, where he showed unruly behaviour, which led to incident severing his lifeline---Deceased lost his life due to a fire shot made by accused but the circumstances whereunder he did so needed serious consideration---Stories narrated by both the sides were polluted with certain amount of exaggeration but court was not precluded from drawing its own independent result based on available record---Accused committed offence under compelling circumstances which over-whelmingly contributed to occurrence---High Court altered conviction of accused under S.302(b) to S.302(c), P.P.C. and reduced his sentence from imprisonment for life to rigorous imprisonment for fourteen years---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. JUDGMENT SHAHID HAMEED DAR, J.---Muhammad Iqbal-appellant was held guilty under section 302(b) P.P.C. for the murder of Rab Nawaz, brother of the complainant, by learned Sessions Judge, Bhakkar vide judgment dated 24-1-2008 and sentenced to imprisonment for life with a direction to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000 to the legal heirs of the deceased as compensation under section 544-A, Cr.P.C. or in default thereof to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. was also extended to him. His co-accused, Rab Nawaz and Ghulam Eesa, were, however, acquitted of the charge on extension of benefit of doubt. 2. The convict/appellant has filed Criminal Appeal No.141 of 2008 against his conviction/sentence, whereas the complainant preferred Criminal Revision No.141 of 2008 seeking enhancement in the sentence awarded to the appellant. I propose to dispose of both the matters together through this single judgment. 3. The facts, as unfolded by Muhammad Bilal complainant (P.W.9), son of Muhammad Azeem, in F.I.R. (Exh.PF/1) are that he was an Imam Masjid in village Bharmi Nawab; he came to his village, Bharmi Chiragh to see his family on 5-10-2005; he along with Muhammad Ibrahim P.W. (not produced) and Inayat Ullah…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492