| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 2275 2014 SLD 2275 (2014) 369 ITR 310 |
Allahabad High Court
IT Appeal No. 77 of 2003, JULY 8, 2014
TARUN AGARWALA AND DINESH GUPTA, JJ
R.S. Agarwal for the Appellant. R.K. Upadhayay for the
Respondent
IT Appeal No. 77 of 2003, JULY 8, 2014
TARUN AGARWALA AND DINESH GUPTA, JJ
R.S. Agarwal for the Appellant. R.K. Upadhayay for the
Respondent
J. K. Synthetics Ltd.
v.
Commissioner of INCOME TAX
Law:
Section:
JUDGMENT Tarun Agarwala, J. - This appeal relates to the assessment year 1983-84. The assessee is a public limited company engaged in the manufacture and sale of synthetic yarn and cement. It also has a subsidiary company under the name of J.K. Satoh Agricultural Machines Ltd. This subsidiary company availed of credit facilities, term loans as well as working capital from various financial institutions. This subsidiary company fared badly in its business and incurred heavy losses as a result, it became a defaulter in paying its debts. The assessee was also a guarantor to the loans taken by the subsidiary company for the purpose of protecting its own business interest. Since the subsidiary company could not adhere to the repayment of its liabilities, the assessee, in order to discharge its legal obligations repaid the instalments of loan to the financial institutions and banks on behalf of the subsidiary company and debited the same to their account. According to the assessee, such repayment of the loan instalment on behalf of the subsidiary company became necessary in order to protect the assessee's own business interest. As a result of making the payments, a debit balance of Rs. 61 lakhs stood in the name of the subsidiary company in the books of the account of the appellant. The debit balance was covered by the retained profits of the assessee during the period 1978-81. 2. In the first round of the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made a disallowance of interest and also disallowed the expenses claimed towards guarantee commission. This was set aside by the appellate authority in appeal filed by the assessee and the matter was remitted for reconsideration to the Assessing Officer. 3. The Assessing Officer, while completing the assessment, again made a disallowance of Rs. 9,54,000. The Assessing Officer found that out of Rs. 61 lakhs only Rs. 8 lakhs was paid by the company to the financial institution and, therefore, was eligible for deduction of interest on the amount of Rs. 8 lakhs under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The Assessing Officer held that the balance amount of Rs. 53 lakhs did…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492