Law:

Section:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 497--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), S. 392--Bail, allowed--No identification parade was arranged--Nominated through supplementary statement--Held: Disclosure by itself was not sufficient to disentitle him for concession of bail--Recovery of money and mobile phone will be appreciated by trial Court after recording evidence, but presently due to reasons case of petitioner calls for further inquiry falling u/Section, 497, Cr.P.C.--Accused was behind bars and his person was no more required by police for purposefo investigation--Bail was allowed. ORDER Petitioner Muhammad Abid, seeks post-arrest bail in case FIR No. 609 dated 19.12.2014 u/S. 392, PPC, registered at Police Station Litton, Lahore. 2. Briefly, the prosecution case mentioned in the FIR is that two unknown persons committed robbery at the store of complainant and snatched Rs. 15,000/- and five mobile phones. In the FIR, specific description has been given and complainant claimed that he can identify the said robbers. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. While lodging FIR, complainant claimed that he can identify the robbers, but surprisingly, in this case no identification parade was arranged for. The learned Prosecutor is unable to explain as to why the identification parade was exempted, however, according to him petitioner was nominated subsequently on 08.01.2015 through a…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492