Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 912 2015 SLD 912 2015 CLD 1917 2016 MLD 389 2015 PCTLR 819
Lahore High Court
Case No: FAO No. 73/2015, DATE of order: 23-06-2015
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH IRFAN KHAN, J.
Mr. Abdul Karim, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Muhammad Khalil Haider, Advocate for the respondent.

Muhammad Ashraf alias Makkhan

VS

Muhammad Akram

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: OrderXXXIXRules1and2

Law: Trade Mark Ordinance, 2001

Section: 21

ORDER In this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order dated 09.02.2015 whereby the learned Additional District Judge, Sheikhupura has dismissed his application for grant of temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the impugned order is bad in law as the learned Additional District Judge has not given due credence to the registration of the appellant's trademark. 3. While learned counsel for the respondent submits that the order of the learned Additional District Judge is in accordance with law as the appellant does not have any exclusive right on the use of word "MAKKHAN" which the appellant himself disclaimed while obtaining Registration No.247678 in Class 30, he further submits that the appellant and the respondent are real brothers and prior to undertaking separate businesses they have been working together under the same name & style and using the same trademark "MAKKHAN". He adds that the appellant, being a brother, was looking after the sales counter and other outdoor business affairs and as such, he has illegally registered the trademark in his sole name whereas the address given on the trademark certificate "Salah-ud-Din Road Sheikhupura" belongs to the respondent, who was undertaking the backend part i.e. manufacturing of the goods for the business. 4. I have heard the arguments and perused the record. 5. In a suit for permanent injunction and damages for infringement of a trademark, which is accompanied by an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC the duty cast upon the learned Trial Court is to consider as to which of the two contesting parties has a prima-facie case alongwith balance of convenience and as to who will suffer an irreparable loss if injunction is granted or denied. Perusal of the record shows that the Trademark Registration No.247678, dated 13.03.2008, in Class 30 in respect of sweets in the name of the appellant has been registered with the following disclaimer:- "Registration of this trade mark shall give no right to the exclusive use of "MAKKHAN SWEET & BAKERS" and other descriptive matter appearing on the label." It was, therefore,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492