| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 2271 2015 SLD 2271 2015 MLD 1401 |
Sindh High Court
DATE of hearing: 28th November, 2014., High Court Appeals Nos. 21 and 22 of 2000, decided on 9th March, 2015.
NADEEM AKHTAR AND MUHAMMAD IQBAL KALHORO, JJ
Muhammad Aslam Butt, Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan (DAG) for Appellants. Farrukh Usman and Aamir Maqsood for
Respondents.
DATE of hearing: 28th November, 2014., High Court Appeals Nos. 21 and 22 of 2000, decided on 9th March, 2015.
NADEEM AKHTAR AND MUHAMMAD IQBAL KALHORO, JJ
Muhammad Aslam Butt, Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan (DAG) for Appellants. Farrukh Usman and Aamir Maqsood for
Respondents.
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence and others
VS
NUMAIR AHMED and 2 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Fatal Accidents Act (XIII of 1855)--- ----S. 1---Suit for recovery of compensation amount---Fatal accident---Burden of proof---Maxim "Res Ipsa Loquitur"---Applicability---Scope---Damages, assessment of---Criteria---Initial burden to prove the circumstances of fatal accident which would identify the carelessness on the part of defendant (driver) lay on the plaintiff---Presumption of negligence in driving the vehicle would be against the driver once accident was admitted by him to have happened---No discrepancy, in the present case, was pointed out in the evidence of plaintiffs disentitling them to get the benefit of the decree which had already stood satisfied---Plaintiffs had supported the averments made in the plaint through their evidence---Occurrence of the incident had not been denied by the defendants in their written statement---Death of the deceased in the accident had not been denied by the defendants---Burden of proof in fatal accident cases would immediately shift from the plaintiff to the defendant where he had expounded his own version of accident---Occurrence of accident in which two persons had lost their lives had been admitted by the defendants in their written statement---Duty of the driver driving heavy vehicle had to be construed proportionately higher than the person who was either pedestrian walking on the road or a cyclist or motorcyclist going on his own side---Responsibility of the driver of the heavy vehicle to drive the vehicle with due care and diligence was heavier than the obligation of a cyclist or motorcyclist---Maxim "Res Ipsa Loquitur" was applicable in accident cases---When an accident had occurred and loss had suffered at the scene then same would bring out negligence of the defendant (driver)---Simple fact of accident causing loss of lives could be construed prima facie an evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant (driver) as against the pedestrian or a cyclist or motorcyclist---Plaintiff was to prove that death of the deceased had occurred due to an accident involving the vehicle which was being driven by the defendant---Nature and mode of the accident needed examination to determine that the accident had not…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492